Search for: "United States v. Heard" Results 6361 - 6380 of 8,393
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2011, 8:23 am by Graeme Hall
Secretary of State for the Home Department v CD [2011] EWHC 2087 (Admin) (29 July 2011): Control order ruled lawful: “reasonable grounds for suspecting CD is a leading figure in network of Islamist extremists” – see guardian.co.uk SCHALK AND KOPF v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am by Stefanie Levine
  Judge Lourie states “[v]isualization does not cleave and isolate the particular DNA; that is the act of human invention. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am by Stefanie Levine
  Judge Lourie states “[v]isualization does not cleave and isolate the particular DNA; that is the act of human invention. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 8:00 pm by Nicola Sutton
Drug and alcohol testing in Canada is legally more restricted than it is in the United States. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 10:29 pm by lawmrh
United States] Cleopatra: A Life by Stacy Schiff [Picked by James J. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 10:16 am by Brandon D'Agostino
Traditionally, cases that mentioned full forensic imaging of hard drives began their captions with United States v. or State v. because they were criminal matters. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 12:28 am by 1 Crown Office Row
On Thursday 28th July, the Supreme Court heard a “permission to appeal” argument in the British nuclear testing case. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 11:31 am by Amy Corbett Dion, Esq.
  The Supreme Court of the United States may ultimately weigh in on this apparent split amongst the Circuits, if and when these cases are appealed. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 7:53 pm by The Legal Blog
Chandresekhara Thevar, AIR 1948 PC 12 and (iii) Secy. of State for India v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
United States, 217 U.S. 349 (1910), a cruel and unusual punishment case. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 5:23 am by Susan Brenner
[and] not only had never had any problems with a unit herself, but had never heard of a unit generating a false report. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
"  Without further comment, here is Breytman v Schechter ; 2011 NY Slip Op 51375(U) ; Decided on July 22, 2011 ; Supreme Court, Kings County Schack, J. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:26 am by Anita Davies
There is some authority on this point from the United States. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am by The Legal Blog
Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that prayer (a) which seeks overruling or setting aside of the judgment already passed in Mr X v. [read post]