Search for: "United States v. Washington"
Results 6361 - 6380
of 10,197
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2012, 3:54 am
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements.For a live daily view of industry news, click here for the Vendor Clips Live News Feed.Follow @InfoGovernanceeDiscovery News Content and ConsiderationsCourt Orders Retention of Outside Vendor to Collect Responsive Documents, Investigate Possible Spoliation –… [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 8:17 am
The agreement still needs approval by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
A different district court followed suit and stated that Section 106 should be read literally to create an independent, exclusive right “to authorize” use of a copyrighted work.14 That court held that “mere authorization . . . constitutes direct infringement and is actionable under United States Copyright Law. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 10:53 am
In June, Judge Richard Posner, sitting by designation on the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, also canceled a trial shortly before it was supposed to begin.The Wisconsin situation has no bearing on the Microsoft v. [read post]
4 Nov 2012, 1:34 am
Paul Farley, D2008-0008 (WIPO February 2, 2008) (the “anna” of “offers bondage, discipline and sado-masochism services … to customers in the San Francisco Bay and Washington D.C. areas of the United States. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:58 am
” United States ex rel. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 10:47 am
That year the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Troxel v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:06 pm
United States, declaring that police use of a heat-sensing device from outside a house was a search that required a warrant. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 9:37 am
RCW 48.48.140 provides: Smoke detection devices in dwelling units–Penalty (1) Smoke detection devices shall be installed inside all dwelling units: (a) Occupied by persons other than the owner on and after December 31, 1981; or (b) Built or manufactured in this state after December 31, 1980. (2) The smoke detection devices shall be designed, manufactured, and installed inside dwelling units in conformance with: (a) Nationally accepted standards; and (b) As… [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:22 am
United States and Setser v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am
Plumer instead voted for his friend, Secretary of State John Quincy Adams for President and United States Ambassador to Britain, William Rush as Vice-President, even though neither Adams nor Rush were candidates for those offices. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 5:00 am
The case was initially sealed while the United States and the state of Wisconsin determined whether to intervene. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:42 am
As you can see, John has a talent that has not been dampened by Sandy, and it also refuses to be completely buried even under the weight of unfortunately necessary sentences like this one: The petition argues that the lower court’s decision conflicts with the “curtilage” rule from United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:21 am
Paul Wolf, who practices in Washington and Colorado in the United States as well as in Colombia, filed a Download Does v Boies Schiller complaintcomplaint yesterday in U.S. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:20 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., the Court considered whether copyrighted works made and purchased abroad can be bought and sold within the United States without the copyright owner’s permission. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 am
United States, 12-5271, for yesterday’s grant in McQuiggin v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:25 am
Eight years later, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Troxel v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 11:04 am
In more plain English, if someone in the United States purchases legitimate copies of some item abroad that has a copyrighted work somewhere in it, can they import those items into the United States and resell them here without violating the Copyright Act? [read post]
