Search for: ". Kerr"
Results 621 - 640
of 6,238
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2019, 12:18 pm
The Perfect Opinion by Andrew Jensen Kerr. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 03158-19 Edwards v The Mail (Cumbria), 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock, No breach- after investigation 02363-19 Kerr v The National, 12 Discrimination (2018), No breach- after investigation 01641-19 Adomaityte v Mail Online, 3 Harassment (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach- after investigation Anonymity Orders Following amendments to CPR Part 39… [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
Last year, my co-blogger Orin Kerr, wrote a post... [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
MP and whistleblower APPC chair Steven Kerr writes in the introduction to the report: This report shines a light on a culture that too often supports the covering up of wrongdoing and the penalising of whistleblowers. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:56 pm
[A tale of two new cases on your constitutional rights when you leave your backpack with your drugs in someone else's car. ] A common problem in Fourth Amendment law that Supreme Court cases leave surprisingly unresolved is what you might call the "property-in-property" problem. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:08 pm
[Thoughts on Gladwell's recent podcast on legal education.] [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 12:06 am
Last year, my co-blogger Orin Kerr, wrote a post recounting his experience the California bar exam at the age of 46. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 9:30 am
LAW LIBRARY reference room (level 2): KE1232 .K47 2019Margaret Kerr, JoAnn Kurtz & Laurence M. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 4:09 am
In response, other prawfs, notably Orin Kerr, raised the cheating heart problem. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:28 am
Lord Kerr disagreed with the approach Lord Wilson and the majority took on justification. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:27 am
Lady Hale and Lord Kerr both gave dissenting judgments (Lady Hale as to outcome, though she agreed with Lord Wilson on the relevant legal principles to be applied; Lord Kerr dissented both on outcome and on the legal approach taken, specifically on the relevant test to be applied by the courts when considering the proportionality of a measure; though both agreed with certain parts of Lord Wilson’s judgment). [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:23 pm
Last week, in Mitchell v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 3:34 am
Kerr said in an email. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm
As predicted by various commentators giving a preview of the case (including in my previous post), the five Supreme Court judges (Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Hodge and Lord Briggs) clarified the applicable law, but unanimously dismissed the appeals against the Court of Appeal decision ([2017] EWCA Civ 1334) on the facts. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 11:23 pm
I recently posted to SSRN a short essay, Justice Kennedy and the Counter-Majoritarian Difficulty. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm
The first full week of term will see the hand down on Wednesday 12 June 2019 by the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge, and Briggs) of its long awaited judgment in the “serious harm” case of Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:38 am
Kerr, MSU Department of Psychology, East Lansing, MI 48840. (2) Death Qualification Voir DireLaw and Human Behavior also reports on research at City University of New York challenging the proposition that death qualification procedures (where, during capital case voir dire, prospective jurors are questioned about their views on capital punishment to determine their ability and willingness to impose the penalty) tends to make final jury members prone to impose the… [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 7:22 am
Sarah Lawsky's valuable report about this year's entry-level law professor hires is out. [read post]
27 May 2019, 6:05 am
Years of public consultation on Canadian digital policy hit an important milestone last week as Innovation, Science and Economic Development Minister Navdeep Bains released the government’s Digital Charter. [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:26 am
The justices were also divided as to how to answer this question, with Lord Kerr and Lady Hale agreeing with Lord Carnwath; Lords Lloyd-Jones, Reed and Sumption declining to give a view; and Lord Wilson dissenting. [read post]
