Search for: "A. C. MARTINEZ"
Results 621 - 640
of 721
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am
Circuit has specifically applied this to denials of a 501(c)(3) tax exemption, holding that "in administering the tax code, the IRS may not discriminate on the basis of viewpoint" (there, against pro-Israel speech that departed from the Administration's foreign policy).[4] 2. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 12:47 pm
Those subject to the 212(a)(9)(C) permanent bar must remain outside the US for at least 10 years before they can apply for a waiver. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:12 am
AND E.C., AND ROSA SILVIA MARTINEZ, INDIVIDUALLY, No. 13-0158 You might remember FORD MOTOR COMPANY v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 2:29 pm
(Acubiso) (Jamaica Plain, MA; Omesimo Martinez, President) Ace Logistics Corporation (Everett, MA; Melonie Brissette, President) Across World Education Company (Boston, MA; Anil Srivastava, President) Actblue Technical Services, Inc. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
TED C. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am
§ 924(c)(1) to a 30-year minimum when the firearm is a machinegun is an element of the offense that must be charged and proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt, or instead a sentencing factor that may be found by a judge by the preponderance of the evidence. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
C. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:10 am
“[C]ommon sense” here suggested that the smoking marijuana found by officers would not be the only amount of marijuana in the home and that any other marijuana in the home might be hidden elsewhere, including in any safes. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm
—Humberto Morales Moreno, Universidad Autonoma de Puebla Author Meets Reader: Carol Steiker & Jordan Steiker, Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital PunishmentTue, 6/20: 12:45 PM - 2:30 PM – Sheraton Maria Isabel Imperio C (2nd Floor) · Authors—Carol Steiker, Harvard Law School and Jordan Steiker, University of Texas School of Law … [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
Defendant: Joseph C. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Mabry, No. 06-2324, 06-2322 Defendants' convictions and sentences for conspiring to solicit and obtain prohibited payments from union contractors, and for soliciting and obtaining such payments, in violation of the Taft-Hartley Act, are affirmed over claims that: 1) the informal resolution of a payment dispute qualified as a "settlement" under 29 U.S.C. section 186(c)(2); 2) insufficient evidence presented at trial to support a finding that the exception to liability under… [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 1:37 pm
Alewelt, 532 F.2d 1165, 1167 (7th Cir. 1976); Martinez v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 10:54 am
Martinez-Scanziani (aka Ms. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 10:54 am
Martinez-Scanziani (aka Ms. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Kuehne, No. 06-3668 A conviction for drug- and firearm-related offenses is affirmed where: 1) a claim that venue was improper in the Southern District of Ohio was without merit; 2) defendant's bartering of firearms for drugs constituted "use" of a firearm within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. section 924(c)(1); 3) although the district court erred in its instructions to the jury regarding the burden of proof necessary to support a conviction for section 924(c), the error… [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 11:52 am
., WILLIAM C. [read post]
12 May 2012, 10:19 pm
Fabián Augusto Cárdenas Castañeda, Universidad Nacional de Colombia45. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
In January, I wrote about the petition filed by the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) in D.C. federal district court for an order granting the writ of habeas corpus on behalf of eleven detainees at Guantanamo Bay—Tofiq Nasser Awad al-Bihani, Sharqawi al-Hajj, Sanad al-Kazimi, Suhail Sharabi, Said Nashir, Abdul Rabbani, Ahmed Rabbani, Abdu Latif Nasser, Abdul Razak, Abdul Malik, and Abu Zubaydah—whom, according to the petition, “have all been detained at Guantánamo… [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:50 am
’c. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:40 pm
The court declined to address defendant’s qualified immunity defense, and remanded for the district court to consider it in the first instance.http://j.st/4s8T11th Circuit:Bankruptcy -- Confirmation -- Chapter 13 plan -- Modification -- Modified plan which proposes plan payments to creditors that escalate over time, with two step-up payments to a fixed payment in months 10-59 and a balloon payment in month 60 of plan, is not confirmable -- Even if, because of the failed mortgage modification… [read post]
