Search for: "Adam Feldman" Results 621 - 640 of 797
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman analyzes data from 2005 to 2017 “on lower court dissents as well as on other aspects of appeals court cases that may signal the significance of these cases to justices,” such as “majority/dissenting pairs of judges with multiple cases reviewed by the Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 4:55 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: Adam Liptak reports in The New York Times on Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman looks at how the Supreme Court has ruled over the last few decades in cases of executive power and in decisions involving rulings by the U.S. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:19 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle Denniston covered the opinion for this blog; other coverage comes from Nina Totenberg of NPR, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Mark Walsh at Education Week’s School Law Blog, and Max Slater of JURIST. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman analyzes “the previous five years of data on Supreme Court oral arguments to break down the participation and winning rates of male and female attorneys,” concluding that although “women make up almost 1/3 of amici, they make up only 13% of all merits arguers and only 11% of all non-governmental merits arguers,” but that “[o]n a per-attorney basis, women were more successful than men in the following… [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman “looks at the Court’s citations to academic scholarship over the past two terms. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 4:58 am by Edith Roberts
” And at Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman analyzes trends in the justices’ dissents from denial of certiorari, which “are part of a whole species of Supreme Court decision-making that takes place outside of the Court’s plenary review,” for the 2010 through 2015 terms. [read post]
3 May 2017, 4:51 am by Edith Roberts
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman examines “the Justices’ speech patterns during oral arguments” this term, focusing on the behavior of the newest justice, Neil Gorsuch, and finding Justice Stephen Breyer to be “typically the most active speaker. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 3:33 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At this blog, Adam Feldman offers an interim set of statistics for the current Supreme Court term. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 4:37 am by Edith Roberts
” And at Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman breaks down this week’s arguments based on the amount of time spent speaking by each justice, noting that “we may have a shift in the most dominant Justices at oral argument. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
Analysis of the term comes from Adam Winkler in The Washington Post. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:50 am by Amy Howe
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman chronicles a “busy year” for the Office of the Solicitor General at the Court. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 4:18 am by Kevin LaCroix
Alert reader Adam Savett sent me a note reminding me of a post that Lyle Roberts had on his 10b-5 Daily blog way back in March 2004 (here), in which Roberts reported on the “Shortest Class Period Even in a Securities Class Action Lawsuit. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from Adam Liptak in The New York Times. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:42 am by Edith Roberts
Tom Harkin and Eve Hill in the Des Moines Register, At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman analyzes “various linguistic aspects of some senior senators’ preliminary remarks from recent confirmation hearings” and suggests that the trends he identifies may become “even more pronounced in the Gorsuch hearings. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 5:15 am by Edith Roberts
Adam Liptak of The New York Times also covers the denial. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
” A different perspective on the vacancy comes from Adam Feldman at Empirical SCOTUS, who “looks at the decision types with Courts composed of other than nine justices by Court era” and concludes that “there appears to be nothing inherently wrong with the notion of a Court of a different size than nine,” although he points out that, historically, “when the number of justices on the Court has been set to any number other than nine, this decision… [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:20 am by Kiran Bhat
  Noah Feldman discusses the election and the Court for Bloomberg View, while Erwin Chemerinsky has an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 4:05 am by SHG
This also holds true in our government — in John Adams’s words, “a government of laws and not of men. [read post]