Search for: "Adam Feldman"
Results 621 - 640
of 816
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm
Feldman’s “Did Japan’s Lenient Lockdown Conquer the Coronavirus? [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 11:49 pm
(Adam Feldman should start a Substack–I would subscribe.) [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:13 am
And at Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman looks at the Justices’ efficiency and concludes that, although “in some sense” Ginsburg “stepped outside of her role as Justice by making these comments, at least by these findings, as a Justice she is doing her job more efficiently than any other Justice on the Roberts Court. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 4:34 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman uses a legal-writing software tool to measure the quality of the writing in “certiorari and cert stage opposition briefs for granted cases during the 2017/2018 term. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 4:34 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman analyzes the court of appeals decisions in which Gorsuch wrote separately in an effort to predict how Gorsuch might rule on some of the cases on the April argument calendar. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 3:55 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman analyzes the justices’ frequency in the majority over time, concluding that “[w]hatever led to the past high level of consensus no longer holds quite as true. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 3:50 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman observes that “if the Supreme Court decides all cases already orally argued this term along with the ten additional cases slated for argument in May by signed decisions, the number of decisions for OT 2019 will reach 58[:] Even with several recent terms where the justices’ opinion output dipped to historic lows, 58 signed decisions would be the fewest since 1864 and 1862 and prior to the blip due to the Civil War it would be the… [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 4:13 am
At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman surveys the court’s “quiet” term so far, remarking on the slow pace of cert grants, the low word count of the opinions issued to date, and the “serious gridlock in the setting of argument dates in a small set of cases,” and predicting that any “significant change, and likely return back to the Supreme Court of old, will not likely take place until a ninth Justice is seated. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 4:29 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman surveys “eight issues with laws that significantly vary at that state level and which affect large swaths of the population” that he suggests “are potential sparks for litigation in hot-button areas that might very well reach the Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 10:35 am
(See also this post by Adam Feldman at Empirical SCOTUS.) [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:04 am
At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman assesses 11 candidates for solicitor general, comparing them in various areas, including their legal and government experience, their ties to the presidential transition team, “and other practice based characteristics that might make them attractive to the Trump administration. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:08 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman examines data related to the Supreme Court’s overruling of its own precedents. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:19 am
Lyle Denniston covered the opinion for this blog; other coverage comes from Nina Totenberg of NPR, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Mark Walsh at Education Week’s School Law Blog, and Max Slater of JURIST. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 4:58 am
” And at Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman analyzes trends in the justices’ dissents from denial of certiorari, which “are part of a whole species of Supreme Court decision-making that takes place outside of the Court’s plenary review,” for the 2010 through 2015 terms. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 3:33 am
At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman surveys the cases in which the court “has ruled a statute unconstitutional and/or has overturned its own precedent … since the 2000 term” and identifies the interest groups that “were clearly dominant in filing briefs on behalf of winning sides in these cases. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 4:25 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman looks at how the Supreme Court has ruled over the last few decades in cases of executive power and in decisions involving rulings by the U.S. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:11 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman analyzes “the previous five years of data on Supreme Court oral arguments to break down the participation and winning rates of male and female attorneys,” concluding that although “women make up almost 1/3 of amici, they make up only 13% of all merits arguers and only 11% of all non-governmental merits arguers,” but that “[o]n a per-attorney basis, women were more successful than men in the following… [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 3:49 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman “examines instances where the justices have discussed aspects of justiciability including mootness, ripeness, standing, political questions, and justiciability generally between the 2017 and current Supreme Court Terms. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:30 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman tries to measure the impact of the litigants on case outcomes by “tak[ing] a basic look at the relative amount of law shared between Court opinions and the parties’ merits briefs. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 4:55 am
” Briefly: Adam Liptak reports in The New York Times on Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
