Search for: "Asbestos Companies"
Results 621 - 640
of 3,232
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2019, 3:28 am
Breeding Insulation Company, 266 S.W.3d 347 (Tenn. 2008). [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 7:30 am
” Continue reading The post Florida Appeals Court Denies Company’s Request to Block Testimony in Asbestos Cancer Lawsuit appeared first on Asbestos & Mesothelioma Law Blog. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 2:58 am
” He cited a 1993 case in which the Tioga Public School District #15 of Williams County, North Dakota, argued that the sale of acoustical plaster containing asbestos qualified as a public nuisance. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 12:31 pm
” Other attempts to expand the use public nuisance theories have met with mixed results: asbestos, guns, lead paint, water and air pollution, and climate change. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 3:31 am
” The company said it was praising Trump for the administration’s efforts to keep asbestos legal for use in the U.S. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 11:52 am
Along with the crushing fear, Julie was beset by insurance companies that looked for any way to deny her medical coverage. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 2:01 am
Case Background The documents to which access was sought related to a lengthy trial in product liability proceedings against Cape Intermediate Holdings, a company involved in the manufacture and supply of asbestos. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 7:34 am
The federal government has had ample time to make this deadly product illegal, but has, for whatever reason, decided that companies are better off self-policing their usage of asbestos. [read post]
10 Aug 2019, 7:45 am
Had Johnson & Johnson been granted the motion, the company would have been able to conduct common discovery on the asbestos cancer lawsuits under a unified jurisdiction, potentially giving the company more leverage to settle or otherwise resolve the claims. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 8:34 am
In 2018, the jury returned a verdict, finding the company liable and assessing the company with $4.7 billion in damages. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 8:29 am
Plaintiffs dispute this, arguing the talc powder defendant company sold contained carcinogenic asbestos and asbestos fibers, resulting in their developing cancer. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 10:00 pm
After the Zurich American Insurance Co (ZAIC) in Missouri, USA paid out a claim on wrongful death from asbestos exposure, it sought a contribution from Insurance Company of North America (INA). [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
Travelers Insurance Company Ltd v XYZ, heard 11 Jun 2019. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 7:19 am
The FDA also lacks authority to mandate a recall, as evidenced by its inability to force Claire’s to recall products that tested positive for asbestos. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
Cape Intermediate Ltd v Dring (for and on behalf of Asbestos Victims Support Groups Forum UK), heard 18-19 Feb 2019. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 6:47 am
A federal grand jury in Washington state is currently examining internal company documents related to what Johnson & Johnson knew about the presence of asbestos fibers or other carcinogens in its talcum powder products like Baby Powder and Shower to Shower. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
Travelers Insurance Company Ltd v XYZ, heard 11 Jun 2019. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
The main drivers of this decline have been federal regulations that banned and restricted many uses of asbestos and aggressive litigation on behalf of injured workers against companies that produced and used asbestos with full knowledge of its dangers. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 8:21 am
Asbestos Contamination Cited in Makeup Recall Twice in the past three months, asbestos contamination has been the cause of a recall by Claire’s, the makeup company. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 8:33 pm
Maryland’s top court has upheld a $7.3 million award to an asbestos exposure victim and his wife despite a lack of direct evidence that the company found responsible had installed the flame-retardant carcinogen. [read post]
