Search for: "B. Kelly"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,421
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2024, 9:24 am
(Kelly, Bruce) (2nd—B332438) Medical Treatment—Utilization Review—Medical Treatment Utilization Schedule Guidelines for Traumatic Brain Injury—WCAB, denying reconsideration, affirmed WCJ’s finding that applicant who suffered traumatic brain injury on 1/24/2019 while employed as wire and cable installer was entitled to inpatient neurorehabilitation.... [read post]
29 May 2019, 6:01 am
In Matter of M-S-, Attorney General Barr overruled Matter of X-K-, relying on INA § 235(b)(1)(B)(ii), which provides that a person who establishes a credible fear of persecution “shall be detained for further consideration of the application for asylum. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
Furr, Kellie Ann. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 7:09 am
Kelly Spurlock, as legal representative for the Estate of J.O. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 9:40 am
See Kelly v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 9:22 am
Select 'A' for Carrie Underwood, 'B' for Kelly Clarkson, or 'C' for Ryan Seacrest. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:34 pm
The Tax Court opinion, while certainly interesting reading, cannot be treated as precedent for other cases (IRC section 7463(b)). [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 6:30 am
" Kelly v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:00 pm
Boyd Emily Bracken Nicholas B. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 9:43 am
Kelly (1970) – Melanie B. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 5:29 pm
(b) Innovations. [read post]
19 May 2008, 2:06 pm
MacGuidwin, and Jay B. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 6:37 am
Kelly seemed so completely ordinary. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 9:33 pm
“Our experience under the new rules taught us that, though elections are still winnable, there is no room for error, and there is not enough time to begin a campaign from scratch once the petition is filed,” wrote Gregory B. [read post]
31 May 2010, 8:23 am
Code § 2422(b). [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:49 am
B. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm
§ 924(c)(3)(B) is unconstitutionally vague in light of Johnson v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 12:34 pm
Buenrostro, No. 08-16185 Conviction and sentencing of defendant on drug-related charges is upheld where district court denied a Rule 60(b) motion after an unsuccessful section 2255 motion because district court lacked jurisdiction as the Rule 60(b) motion was, in substance a second, barred section 2255 application. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 8:17 am
See Kelly v. [read post]
