Search for: "BEENE v. BEENE" Results 621 - 640 of 191,925
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2019, 9:19 pm by Patent Docs
This pattern has been shown consistently in this appellate court, from Chief Judge Markey through Chief Judges Michel and Rader. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 9:44 pm by Patent Docs
Perhaps one reason for this less predictable negative outcome in these technologies is the countervailing (to some extent) deference the Federal Circuit has been compelled to give Patent and Trademark Office decisions on factual questions (see Dickinson v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 6:12 pm by Howard Bashman
“Republican Supreme Court to Decide If Democrats Are Allowed to Win Elections Anymore; The independent state legislature theory has been picking up steam on the right; Moore v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:19 am by INFORRM
The recent decision of the Mr Justice Christopher Clarke in Wallis v Meredith ([2011] EWHC 75 (QB)) resulted in the Claimant’s case being struck out on the basis that there had been no real or substantial tort following Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc ([2005] QB 946). [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 8:44 am by Pasha Law PC
Abortion is a very controversial topic that has been debated and argued over since Roe v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
Appeal dismissed after employee fails to prove efforts to exhaust her administrative remedy would have been an exercise in futility Amorosano-LePore v Grant, 56 AD3d 663 This decision by the Appellate Division illustrates the importance of exhausting administrative remedies before seeking judicial relief. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 3:16 am by traceydennis
Noble v Owens [2010] EWCA Civ 224; [2010] WLR (D) 73  ”Where fresh evidence was adduced in the Court of Appeal tending to show that the judge at first instance had been deliberately misled the court would only allow the appeal and order a retrial where the fraud was either admitted or the evidence of it was incontrovertible. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 3:49 am by sally
Baxter v Mannion [2010] EWHC 573 (Ch); [2010] WLR (D) 82 “There was no good reason to confine the jurisdiction of the registrar under para 5(a) of Sch 4 to the Land Registration Act 2002 to the correction of procedural mistakes. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 8:42 pm by Patent Docs
By Antony Craggs -- Since the introduction of the doctrine of equivalents in the UK in Actavis v Lilly, it has been questioned whether a claim can be extended by said doctrine (so that a product infringes the claim) where such an extension would render the claim obvious over the prior art at the priority date. [read post]