Search for: "BISHOP v. STATE" Results 621 - 640 of 965
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2012, 6:01 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Attorney in the case of United States v Samuel Mullet, et al, charged members of a peculiar Amish synod with hate crimes; charges that involve far more complex proofs.About two-years ago, ole Samuel Mullet [you cannot make it up] broke away from the traditional fundamentalist Christian Amish church in which he was raised, to start a renegade sect of his own in Bergholz, Ohio. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:46 am by Anders Walker
  Currently in the news thanks to Fisher v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 11:13 am
It has adopted that line of argument  in order to avoid the application of "neutral principles of law", as endorsed by the United States Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:52 am by Rosalind English
The red benches, heavily stacked with the religious, including 26 bishops, saw off the last bills. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:34 am by Richard A. Epstein
  From this caldron emerged the famous Footnote 4 in the 1938 case of United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:39 am by Michael Geist
First, a unanimous court in the song previews reset the law with an emphasis once again on balance and user rights: In Theberge v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:24 am by Anthony Fairclough
Update In the recent case of JGE v The Trustees of the Portsmouth Roman Catholic Diocesan Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 938, the Court of Appeal held that a bishop could be held vicariously liable for abuse carried out by a parish priest. [read post]