Search for: "Bader v. United States" Results 621 - 640 of 1,338
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the justices heard argument in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 8:51 am by Victoria Kwan
United States, with Justice Clarence Thomas watching from the audience. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 12:18 pm by John Elwood
United States, 17-8 Issues: (1) Whether a tribe that opted out of the Indian Reorganization Act can have its status under the Act revived under the Indian Land Consolidation Act, 25 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 12:41 pm by Ilya Somin
United States (2012), the Supreme Court rejected the Obama administration’s dubious argument that temporary flooding of property by the government can never qualify as a taking. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 7:09 am by Andrew Hamm
United States, in which Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes’ dissent in defense of free speech has proven more powerful and lasting than the original holding. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 8:55 am by Amy Howe
The highest-profile grant of the day came in United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 12:47 pm by Amy Howe
When the justices took the bench this morning to hear oral argument in District of Columbia v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 9:44 am by Kevin Johnson
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg quickly took a poke at the government’s case, noting that someone with a credible fear of persecution who is applying for asylum might be able to gain parole into the United States. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 5:42 am
  Whether that deserves to be called a "civics lecture" or not, it did rouse Ruth Bader Ginsburg. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 8:50 am by Kevin Johnson
Arguing for the United States, Deputy Solicitor General Edwin Kneedler again defended the constitutionality of Section 16(b), as he had in January. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:28 am by Victoria Kwan
The State and the Free Times covered Alito’s speech. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 7:30 am by Amy Howe
Turning to the district court’s conclusion that the 2010 map also had a discriminatory effect, the challengers assert that several justices specifically envisioned an inquiry into whether a redistricting plan had a discriminatory effect in League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:28 am by Edith Roberts
United States and two related cert petitions the justices will consider at Monday’s “long conference,” the first after their summer recess, that “present what is unquestionably the most important civil-military relations question that [the court has] confronted in decades. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:30 am by Russell Spivak
Quoting Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]