Search for: "Bangs v. Bangs"
Results 621 - 640
of 736
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2020, 10:35 am
State v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 12:41 pm
As the title of Ovid's work, late 14c., Metamorphoseos, from Latin Metamorphoses (plural).transform (v.)mid-14c., "change the form of" (transitive), from Old French transformer (14c.), from Latin transformare "change in shape, metamorphose," from trans "across, beyond" (see trans-) + formare "to form" (see form (v.)). [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 6:06 pm
She did a bang-up job! [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:08 pm
Hogan v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am
” However, with enough coordinated large trades in the one minute window (in a process known as “banging the close”), it could be possible to manipulate the “fixes. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:44 pm
We’re not yet done with Glossip v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
You have come to the right place (IP Dragon) Court protects transliteration of well-known international enterprise name (International Law Office) How to go to China for innovation (China Law Blog) Costa Rica Costa Rica approves Free Trade Agreement between US, Central America and Dominican Republic (CAFTA) (IP tango) Europe EU judges on Community patent and court (IAM) (Managing Intellectual Property) European IP forum considers standards-setting (Managing Intellectual… [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 8:01 am
China NNN Agreements are the key to protecting your IP from China before you provide your IP to anyone in China. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(IP Dragon) Patent strategies for foreign R&D work in China (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) All clichés but still true: Intellectual Property Rights enforcement in China leaves room for improvement (IP Dragon) Recognition and protection of well-known trade marks (International Law Office) Revised Chinese patent law aims at quality, compulsory licensing (Intellectual Property Watch) Zen and the art of intellectual property in China (IP Dragon) Colombia… [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 7:22 am
In Gray v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm
Gillies, Comment, Not with a bang, but a whimper: Congress’s proposal to overturn the Supreme Court’s Leegin decision with the Discount Pricing Consumer Protection Act of 2009, 18 VILLANOVA SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT LAW JOURNAL 645 (2011)Nathaniel Grow, Louisville v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 7:49 am
From Evans v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 8:11 am
We see Beckett v Verlander, and then Lester v Doug Davis. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 7:01 am
Josh is a huge fan of the 5-4 Bates v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 5:05 am
In Attorney-General v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
Ballweg v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:15 am
“The press are quite prepared to bang the drum of public interest when it suits them, but once they have milked the story they are off elsewhere like a puff of smoke,” she says, giving the Times’ now silent campaign against secret family courts as an example. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:17 pm
v=EbthMC6spAE * Norm MacDonald – Moth Jokehttps://www.youtube.com/watch? [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
In Giraldo v Fernandez, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 5226159, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:52 am
Most of my previous posts here about Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood have been devoted to the question of whether the plaintiffs have adequately alleged that federal law imposes a "substantial burden" on their exercise of religion--the threshold question under RFRA. [read post]