Search for: "Blank v. Blank" Results 621 - 640 of 1,996
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2007, 3:51 pm
Today the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision styled Gillespie v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 3:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co., 21 NY3d 324, 334), they sufficiently alleged the existence of an attorney-client relationship (see Ripa v Petrosyants, 203 AD3d 770; Blank v Petrosyants, 203 AD3d 685; Mawere v Landau, 130 AD3d 986, 990). [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 11:43 am by John Jascob
However, the plaintiff says that the planned vote on the amendment violates the Delaware General Corporation Law by requiring Class A (public) stockholders to vote together with the SPAC’s sponsor, which owns Class B stock (Bass v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:28 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
A portion of that law that regulates the centers' speech violates the First AmendmentThe case is The Evergreen Association v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
However, citing Simkin v Blank, 19 NY3d 46, the Appellate Division explained that "allegations consisting of bare legal conclusions ... are not entitled to any such consideration. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 7:32 am
This issue is not dissimilar, in the eyes of this Kat, to that raised in the German litigation leading to the ruling of the Court of Justice in Case C-39/97 Canon v MGM back in 1998, involving blank tapes and those on which films were recorded.No joke. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 4:18 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Our High Court will once again be called upon to "fill-in-the-blanks" of the MMA. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 11:57 am
 This was the master plying his trade. da Vinci pausing before the blank canvas, art waiting to be created. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 10:08 am by Rebecca Weitzman
Fill in the blank: the ACLU argued in front of the Supreme Court this week that ____ should not be patentable. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:01 am by John Jascob
Ordinarily, starting from a blank slate, the court would find it a stretch to characterize the transaction at issue as the purchase or sale of the plaintiff’s stock. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
However, citing Simkin v Blank, 19 NY3d 46, the Appellate Division explained that "allegations consisting of bare legal conclusions ... are not entitled to any such consideration. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
A good regulation fills in the blanks left by a vague law while remaining consistent with the law's aims. [read post]