Search for: "Bowes v State"
Results 621 - 640
of 719
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(EDTexweblog.com) US Army - More DOA patents (12:01 Tuesday) US Copyright - Decisions Reporting on 6th Circuit decision in Bridgeport Music v UMG Recordings concerning copyright in 'Bow wow wow, yippie yo, yippie yea' and accompanying musical elements (The 1709 Copyright Blog) (Property, intangible) District Court W D Washington dismisses Freedom of Information Act suit for information on counterfeit seizures: Watkins v US Bureau of Customs and Border Protection… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(EDTexweblog.com) US Army - More DOA patents (12:01 Tuesday) US Copyright - Decisions Reporting on 6th Circuit decision in Bridgeport Music v UMG Recordings concerning copyright in 'Bow wow wow, yippie yo, yippie yea' and accompanying musical elements (The 1709 Copyright Blog) (Property, intangible) District Court W D Washington dismisses Freedom of Information Act suit for information on counterfeit seizures: Watkins v US Bureau of Customs and Border Protection… [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 7:24 pm
†In the case of State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 1:34 pm
Miss S argued that if the collateral contract contradicted any of the terms of the contract for sale it would be invalidated by section 2., as per Business Environment Bow Lane Ltd v Deanwater Estates Ltd [2007] LT & R 389. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
State, 754 N.W.2d 639, 643 (S.D. 2008); Sisney v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 10:18 am
September 23, 2009, Judges Bowes, Freeburg, and Popovich).The prevailing was defense counsel in the case, Craig E. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 12:00 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Tuesday in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 3:36 pm
Means, 2009 WL 3065089 (Pa.Super. 2009, Judges Bowes, Freeburg, and Popovich). [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 6:36 am
NO-FAULT - MANDAMUS RELIEF - CPLR ARTICLE 78 Matter of Okslen Acupuncture P.C. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 8:34 am
Scinto v London Borough of Newham [2009] EWCA Civ 837 is an appeal from Bow County Court on whether the tenant was still entitled to exercise her right to buy on terms first set out in December 1999. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 9:57 am
” (United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 9:10 am
" Phillips v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:48 am
In fact, I can state the unequivocal belief that that day would absolutely never come. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 1:40 pm
Supreme Court and American society at large, even post Lawrence v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 12:08 pm
The opinion they joined (in another 5-4 decision with just this lineup) in Iqbal v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 11:37 am
” The state justices said they agreed with the trial court in this case that Bush v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 1:48 pm
See SCOTUSBlog coverage here and opinion here.I think CAAF will need to re-look at the rule in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 12:36 pm
The 5-4 ruling in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Harris v. [read post]
