Search for: "Bryant v. Bryant"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,032
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2010, 4:01 am
" The cardiologist made reference to the fact that Rivera suffered from a variety of risk factors commonly associated with coronary heart disease, including obesity and hypertension.The Appellate Division said that it had previously held "the [statutory] presumption is effectively rebutted when evidence of risk factors is coupled with expert testimony that excludes an applicant's employment as a causative factor," citing Bryant v Hevesi, 41 AD3d at 932.The… [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 1:30 pm
Com. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
The defendants cited to Bryant v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 8:33 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, July 08, 2009 US v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 3:47 am
Bryant Jr. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 6:18 am
The first appeal is the APAC v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 11:03 am
Dreeben argues in Turner v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Matter of Walsh v DiNapoli, 83 AD3d 1278, 1279 [3d Dept 2011]; Matter of Bryant v Hevesi, 41 AD3d 930, 932 [3d Dept 2007]), petitioner's argument on this point overlooks the fact that his own cardiologist concluded that petitioner's disabling heart condition did not arise out of his employment. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Matter of Walsh v DiNapoli, 83 AD3d 1278, 1279 [3d Dept 2011]; Matter of Bryant v Hevesi, 41 AD3d 930, 932 [3d Dept 2007]), petitioner's argument on this point overlooks the fact that his own cardiologist concluded that petitioner's disabling heart condition did not arise out of his employment. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 8:58 am
Statutory Damages The court apparently reverses Bryant v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 12:44 pm
Bryant was employer representative with potential knowledge regarding... [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:06 am
In 1996, we were co-counsel in Romer v. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 11:32 am
Earlier today this Kat posted a guest item by Katfriend Aaron Wood on the ruling of Mrs Justice Rose in Roederer v J Garcia Carrion S.A. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 9:30 am
Photo by Haboob Daniel Bryant. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 12:48 pm
See People v. [read post]
19 Sep 2006, 7:06 am
Because his case was no longer pending before the appellate courts when McAdam was decided (six weeks later), he is not directly entitled to McAdam relief (see Bryant v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
In Williams v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:01 pm
Second, at 10.30am on the same date in Court 1 Foskett J will hand down judgment on the renewed application for permission to apply for judicial review by Lord Prescott, Chris Bryant MP and others (R (on the application of Bryant and ors) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis). [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:29 am
At JURIST, Jaclyn Belczyk reports on Thursday’s decision in Lane v. [read post]
