Search for: "Burden v. Burden" Results 621 - 640 of 30,948
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2012, 7:53 pm by jmaddock
Roland Hill challenged the constitutionality of Section 753(1.1) of the Criminal Code, arguing that it violated the presumption of innocence and principles of fundamental justice insofar as shifted the burden of proof onto convicted offenders to demonstrate that they should not be prosecuted as “dangerous offenders. [read post]
7 May 2008, 1:11 am
Oyarce v Cheshire County Council (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening); [2008] WLR (D) 138 “S 54A of the Race Relations Act 1976, which implemented Council Directive 2000/43/EC, on its true construction shifted the burden of proof upon a respondent to disprove discrimination in relation only to a complaint of discrimination and not to a complaint of victimisation. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 11:34 am
The New York Court of Appeals will hear arguments in February in Ramos v. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 7:06 pm by Tom Smith
The Court doesn't decide whether that means they are subject to an "undue burden" test (as under Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 8:46 pm by Patent Docs
These considerations were evident in the Federal Circuit's decision in Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 6:41 am by hlpronline
Just before 9:00 PM EST, District Court Judge Ramos, in Veasey v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 2:28 pm
"A misapplication of the burden of proof is reversible error (see M.M. v. [read post]