Search for: "Burn v Burn" Results 621 - 640 of 4,975
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2007, 4:39 am
The Second Department denied the motion, in Hunt v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 7:04 am
 Below are excerpts from an article regarding arbitration clauses in nursing home contracts provided by Dollar, Burns & Becker, L.C. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 6:42 am by Calvin Massey
  If it burns carbon to ward off winter cold it's probably subject to mandatory EPA regulation. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 12:35 pm
Troubling new research indicates a domino-effect of substandard care: That there are fewer nursing teachers, which means there are fewer new graduating nurses, which means the nurses who are employed are quickly burned out which ultimately means more patients are suffering from higher rates of infection and neglect. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 8:31 am by Broussard & David
In order to be protected by the Jones Act, the Supreme Court rule in Chandris, Inc., v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 11:00 pm
PATIENT INCURRED BURNS OVER 70% OF HIS BODYAfter he suffered second- and third-degree burns over 70% of his body, in a facility owned and operated by Services for the Underserved (SUS), “M.E.S. [read post]
24 May 2020, 6:06 am by Howard Friedman
”The City mentions the church burning in its latest brief, but in a manner less commendable than condemnable. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 2:15 pm by Brian A. Comer
  This week's verdict survey involves a hot chicken sandwich.Capsule Summary: A Cherokee County jury returned a defense verdict in a claim brought by a male plaintiff in his mid-forties in which he alleged the chicken sandwich he purchased from a Burger King was too hot and caused second degree burns to his gums.Case Information: Frank Chancellor v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 11:00 pm
PATIENT INCURRED BURNS OVER 70% OF HIS BODYAfter he suffered second- and third-degree burns over 70% of his body, in a facility owned and operated by Services for the Underserved (SUS), “M.E.S. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 11:14 am by C.E. Petit
I'm still digesting this morning's opinion in Salazar v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by David Schraub
And the result is that many amendments that command majority, or even super-majority, support, do not end up clearing all the hurdles of Article V (think of the ERA, flag burning, or school prayer amendments).The result is a constitution that runs a perpetual risk of being out of sync with majority perspectives. [read post]