Search for: "Butler v State"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,005
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2012, 2:51 am
Butler v Catinella, 58 AD3d 145, 150). [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:40 pm
The United States Supreme Court today continued with its line of cases favoring children in the decisions of Miller v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 12:25 pm
Butler, Assn. of Research Libraries). [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:33 pm
Tekle v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 6:19 am
United States v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:36 am
But as R.A.V. v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 8:54 am
Maryland State Board of Elections v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am
United States: Dominique Strauss-Kahn, former head of the IMF, has filed a countersuit of defamation against the hotel maid who accused him of sexual assault. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:26 pm
The citizen petition discusses in some detail the jurisprudence under the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment, describing Ruckelshaus v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:56 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:00 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:09 am
Columbus : Ohio State University Press, 2011 vii, 181 p. ; 24 cm. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 10:11 am
That case, Butler v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 4:28 am
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has agreed to review the important natural gas drilling lease case of Butler v Powers. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 10:38 am
Ohio and NAACP v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 1:19 am
High Court (Chancery Division) Public Trustee v Butler & Anor [2012] EWHC 858 (Ch) (03 April 2012) DKH Retail Ltd v Republic (Retail) Ltd [2012] EWHC 877 (Ch) (03 April 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) J Preston & Sons Ltd [2012] EWHC 870 (QB) (03 April 2012) Letts v Royal Sun Alliance Plc [2012] EWHC 875 (QB) (03 April 2012) The Serious Organised Crime Agency v Robb [2012] EWHC 803 (QB) (30 March 2012) Sharif, R. v… [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:09 pm
A snapshot of recent cases, for example, shows that £10,000 can easily be incurred by one party just to get to strike out or summary judgement (see reports on Lait v Evening Standard, Kordowski v Hudson, Robins v Kordowski) – and for some cases this incredibly conservative (Apsion v Butler). [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 3:18 pm
Donohoo v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 11:13 am
Several states have laws that protect off-duty conduct, although it is unclear whether they apply to off-duty communications. [read post]
