Search for: "C v. B"
Results 621 - 640
of 22,713
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2023, 9:02 am
” Heldebrandt v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:01 pm
Call Now 1-866-939-5940Overview of the Offence According to s. 76 of the Criminal Code: Intimidating Parliament or legislature 76 Every one who, unlawfully, by force or threat thereof, or by any other form of intimidation, seizes or exercises control of an aircraft with intent (a) to cause any person on board the aircraft to be confined or imprisoned against his will, (b) to cause any person on board the aircraft to be transported against his will to any place other than the next… [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
[November 21, 2023] Question 128D.24 Question: When identifying a total shareholder return peer group under Regulation S-K Item 402(v)(2)(iv), the registrant must use either the same index or issuers used by it to comply with Item 201(e)(1)(ii) or the companies it uses as a peer group under Regulation S-K Item 402(b). [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:45 pm
* * * B. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm
Indeed, as also noted in Response Clothing [IPKat here], with specific regard to the category ‘works of artistic craftmanship’, ‘[c]omplete conformity with art.2 [of the InfoSoc Directive], in particular as interpreted by the CJEU in Cofemel, C-683/17 would exclude any requirement that the [claimant's fabric] has aesthetic appeal’.Third, having regard to the EU Member States, two points are worth raising: (a) those still going around saying that the… [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:05 am
” Kansas v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
Apart from the “naughty” aspects of the design (according to Pevsner), an unusual feature of the church is that is was the only public building in the village that unaffected by the floods of 2005 and 2015, and the Petitioners wish to be able to respond to any future flood event with appropriate facilities [22(c)]. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 9:49 am
Days after I wrote about the Guardian Ad Litem (GAL) role for litigants here in the R.B. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am
Interpreting § 315(c) to allow joinder regardless of time limits renders § 315(b). [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 7:46 am
Il devient ainsi particulièrement bénéfique que le cadre négocié soit clair entre les parties en présence. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
The decision then notes that Petitioner's remaining arguments on this point, to the extent not specifically addressed, had been examined and found to be "lacking in merit" by the Appellate Division.* RSSL §507-b(c) provides as follows: c. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
The decision then notes that Petitioner's remaining arguments on this point, to the extent not specifically addressed, had been examined and found to be "lacking in merit" by the Appellate Division.* RSSL §507-b(c) provides as follows: c. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 12:54 am
In OP v Commune d’Ans [2023] EUECJ C‑148/22, the Grand Chamber handed down a preliminary ruling following a request by the Tribunal du Travail de Liège. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 12:15 am
Tran v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 2:15 pm
By Chris Holman Purdue Pharma L.P. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 9:28 am
This includes juvenile court records (G.S. 7B-3000(b)); all law enforcement records and files concerning juveniles, unless jurisdiction has been transferred to superior court (G.S. 7B-3001(b)); and all records and files maintained by the Division of Juvenile Justice (G.S. 7B-3001(c)). [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 7:27 am
B. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 3:35 pm
Co., No. 19 C 3083, 2023 WL 4297654, at *2 (N.D. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 7:30 am
One of the longest legal cases based on position trade marks is Shoe Branding Europe BVBA v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
The CJEU has said that the extensive use which is made of a mark is relevant to the assessment of confusion in Specsavers v Asda (C-252/12), but I think the judge has stretched that principle too far.Lots of options to read more about this case here.3. [read post]
