Search for: "CO Barrett"
Results 621 - 640
of 768
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Trump v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
On the night of July 6, 1988, Mexico was on the verge of the unthinkable. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
As was true last year, the recently completed Supreme Court Term was marked by several high-profile and contentious decisions in which a conservative 6-to-3 majority, for example, ended race-conscious affirmative action in higher education, scuttled President Biden’s student debt relief initiative, and found that the First Amendment protects a vendor’s refusal to design wedding websites for same-sex couples. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm
Melina Abdullah, co-founder of Black Lives Matter Los Angeles, reportedly stated that the curfews “suppress our ability to mobilize fully and focus full attention on the true issue of concern in the protests—police violence against Black people. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Co. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 6:51 am
There were no “Innocent Sellers” in this tragedy. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:00 am
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:21 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.). [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:48 am
” In Barrette Outdoor Living, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
The event was co-sponsored by the Stanford Center for Racial Justice and the Stanford Constitutional Law Center. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 12:27 pm
The committee will hear testimony from Barbara Barrett, the secretary of the air force, and Gen. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Trump’s Committee Paying for Lawyers of Key Mar-a-Lago Witnesses MSN – Devlin Barrett, Josh Dawsey, and Isaac Stanley-Becker (Washington Post) | Published: 12/5/2022 Former President Trump’s PAC is paying legal bills for some key witnesses involved in the Justice Department investigation into whether Trump mishandled classified documents, obstructed the investigation, or destroyed government records. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 11:30 am
The complaint quotes from a 2005 report prepared by the Commission on Federal Election Reform, which was co-chaired by former President Jimmy Carter and former Secretary of State James A. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 12:25 pm
Any such litigation, of course, is likely to ultimately end with the Supreme Court, where the confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett—and her decision as to whether she is obligated to recuse herself from 2020 election matters—may prove instrumental in determining the outcome. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 10:00 am
As my colleague Seth Barrett Tillman and I explained on the Volokh Conspiracy (Parts 6, 7, and 8), our official-versus-individual capacity argument is likely the only thing standing between President Trump and a discovery order. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
No conflict.To be sure, one could complain that Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett seem to be allowing states and the federal government to impose their peculiar religious vision of “life” on people who practice a religion that rejects such a view. [read post]
[Josh Blackman] The PROMESA Board Members Are Not "Officers of the United States." So What Are They?
10 Jun 2020, 11:31 am
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Recently, the Supreme Court decided Financial Oversight and Management Bd. for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 10:00 am
Loglisci, Meyer, Harding, hedge fund manager Barrett Wissman, and unlicensed placement agent Julio Ramirez, Jr. have pled guilty to Martin Act securities fraud charges for conduct related to the pension fund. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 5:55 am
After the confirmation of Justice Amy Coney Barrett, however, the state’s attorneys changed course and explicitly asked the Court to uphold Mississippi’s 15-week abortion ban by overturning Roe v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:42 am
As state courts and officials in Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Minnesota, Texas and elsewhere modify state election rules to accommodate the unprecedented challenges that COVID-19 has presented, some argue that their actions are unconstitutional.[2] Justice Amy Coney Barrett has not yet weighed in on the issue, and the remaining Justices appear to be evenly divided.[3] As an originalist matter, the Supreme Court should stay out of these cases. [read post]
