Search for: "CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANT v. US "
Results 621 - 640
of 7,782
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2019, 6:13 am
Wrongful use of retirement plan participant data was among the claims made by a class of 40,000 participants against the plan sponsor and others in Cassell et al. v. [read post]
28 May 2022, 6:47 am
US * Catching Up on a FOSTA Case–ML v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 7:22 am
Accordingly, the employee’s use of emails containing confidential patient information was patently unreasonable and a reasonable jury could not find that she was engaged in a protected activity. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:24 am
Zhang was advised in the terms of use of Marvell’s extranet of the confidentiality of information on the extranet and the terms of use. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 1:18 pm
discussing Babasa v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:00 am
In Cintas Corp. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:26 am
Box v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:27 am
Brunswick presented evidence showing that its former employees improperly disseminated confidential information by emailing documents to their personal accounts and then sending that information to third parties. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 12:00 am
Rubin alleged that the inventors named in the patents used confidential information—from a manuscript and abstract submitted by Rubin to the American Journal of Human Genetics—to complete the inventions described and claimed in the patents. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 3:00 am
FOIA Exemption 4 protects “trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person [that is] privileged or confidential. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 2:48 pm
” In 1995 the Seventh Circuit in Pepsico v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 5:02 am
That brings us back to Fasteners For Retail, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
In that context, protective orders can be used to limit the dissemination of materials that will not ultimately prove admissible at trial, Fed R. [read post]
9 May 2012, 2:45 pm
In the post-eBay v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 1:00 pm
Co., L.P.A. v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 7:32 am
The NDA said that Farrell would "not directly or indirectly disclose or use for any reason whatsoever any Confidential Information obtained by" him due to his employment. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:36 am
That question was whether there's authority allowing a product liability defendant to redact or otherwise keep confidential its customers' contact information where such records are otherwise the subject of discovery. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 1:16 pm
In Gatto v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 7:45 am
Thus, while it may have been “wrong” for one of the individual defendants to send some of this information to her personal email, the court found “no evidence she or Aya ever used or relied on such information to recruit, or attempt to recruit, any of the travel nurses on that [list of Travelers and their information]. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 1:35 am
There was no evidence of confidential information, trade secrets or trade connections held by the former employees to warrant protection. [read post]
