Search for: "COPE v. COPE"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,044
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2013, 1:40 am
Last week Judge Koh (United States District Court for the Northern District of California) denied a couple of Samsung motions that would, if granted, have delayed the limited Apple v. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 3:49 pm
Bandera and People v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 4:15 pm
But that ruling, in Marks v. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 6:07 am
In Acosta v Acosta--- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 3970239 (C.A.8 (Minn.)) [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 6:14 am
Faulkner Literary Rights, LLC v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 2:49 am
I freely accept that to make that judgment you need a comparator, but the comparator should be someone who is able to cope if they were homeless. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 2:49 am
I freely accept that to make that judgment you need a comparator, but the comparator should be someone who is able to cope if they were homeless. [read post]
29 May 2013, 10:51 pm
Despite ACA’ amendments to HIPAA’s bona fide wellness program rules and the 11th Circuit’s rejection of an EEOC challenge in Broward County v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 9:28 am
He states that you find it difficult to cope and need help and support with your daily needs. [read post]
27 May 2013, 9:28 am
He states that you find it difficult to cope and need help and support with your daily needs. [read post]
26 May 2013, 1:33 pm
Noting that “[v]arious situations have come to the attention of the Departments where a health insurance policy is advertised as fixed indemnity coverage” that do not “Meet the conditions for excepted benefits,” FAQ XI warns, “The Departments plan to work with the States to ensure that health insurance issuers comply with relevant requirements for different types of insurance policies and provide consumers the protections of the Affordable Care… [read post]
22 May 2013, 11:27 am
Two years ago, in the case of American Electric Power v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 8:32 am
The question of whether someone can cope on the streets is a very fact sensitive judgment and plainly the authority making the decision can take everything into account. [read post]
15 May 2013, 8:32 am
The question of whether someone can cope on the streets is a very fact sensitive judgment and plainly the authority making the decision can take everything into account. [read post]
9 May 2013, 3:31 am
The Third Circuit’s decision in Glaxo is distinguishable from the Ninth Circuit’s position on a similar issue in Parra v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 3:43 pm
They said he would then have a chance to resist, or better cope with, his other illnesses. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:11 pm
Indeed they are, due to the Supreme Court’s holding in Marquette Nat’l Bank v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 2:21 pm
, Michael Sipos and Gary Smith v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 11:12 am
In a case dating back to 1991, Crossroads Apartments Associates v. [read post]
