Search for: "CROSS v. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2017, 3:00 pm
I'm usually not a fan of the California Supreme Court reaching out to depublish an opinion by the Court of Appeal.But here's a good candidate for precisely that.There's a loose horse out in a rural area, so police officers (understandably) investigate. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 1:05 pm
Okay, well, I can certainly tell what today's theme is going to be in the California Court of Appeal. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 12:37 pm
On June 3, 2019, in the California case, Adams v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 3:09 am
The decision in Porter v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
Here is Eric's report: **** The California Supreme Court heard oral argument in Sonic-Calabasas, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 5:14 am
The court of appeals reversed. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:09 pm
John’s Anglican Church in Petaluma, CA ; Episcopal Diocese of Northern California v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:22 pm
County of Sonoma, Court of Appeal Case No. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:00 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit ruled in Martin v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 10:28 am
Once you leave California, default starts to look like an even better strategy, as shown in Caplan v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
The petitioner and court-appointed counsel lodged an appeal with the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal in Louisiana claiming insufficient evidence to support the conviction. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 11:00 am
The California State Appeals Court ruled in favor of the prosecution, deciding that the defendant procured the absence of the witness through murder. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 1:52 am
Doe v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 10:22 am
The case, Quon v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 12:30 pm
Saltonstall appealed, and the court of appeal affirmed the lower court decision. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 4:03 pm
As to this issue, the appellate court deferred to the California Supreme Court’s holding in People v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 4:12 am
The Surrogate’s Court, inter alia, granted Christina’s cross motion for summary judgment, and this Court affirmed (see Matter of Cassini, 95 AD3d 1311). [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 8:49 pm
It would make sense for the appeals court to discuss and adjudge the underlying liability issues and Apple's request for an extraordinary remedy at the same time.In order to bring their appeals on the merits, Apple and Samsung had to wait for a formal final judgment in that second California case. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 5:51 am
The Martinez court relied on an earlier decision of the California Court of Appeals: People v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 8:54 am
The appeals court did so when Huawei wanted the case to be put on a faster track. [read post]
