Search for: "California v. Marks"
Results 621 - 640
of 4,364
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2018, 9:58 am
As a bonus insult, the court denigrates the strength of the “Passport Health” trademark, saying it’s a “conceptually weak” mark. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 4:01 pm
When shown a picture of the marks on his back, he teared up. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 7:34 am
This August 11, 2009 opinion marks the seventeenth Federal Circuit decision focusing on Hyatt's patent rights in addition to the 2003 Supreme Court decision Franchise Tax Bd. of California v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 1:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth’s Circuit’s 1979 ruling of AMF, Inc v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
Facebook Faces Jurisdictional Hurdle in its Trademark Lawsuit Against Faceporn--Facebook v. Pedersen
15 Mar 2012, 12:09 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Facebook v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 12:26 pm
Hall in Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 12:26 pm
Hall in Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 12:31 pm
Bank v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 11:45 am
Defendant Peju, a Northern California winery, began using the mark LIANA for wine in 2002. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 6:09 am
"] March 14, 2023 - 10:30 AM [In-person]: Audemas Piquet Holding S.A. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 5:57 pm
” Reversing the Central District of California in the case of K and N Engineering, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 6:19 am
And he outlined the facts from which the suit arose, noting that [Van Praagh], a resident of California, and [Gratton], a resident of New York, are siblings. . . . [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:31 am
MARKS Download CUSSON v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 12:01 pm
Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 12:15 pm
Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 4:24 pm
Mark V. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 9:13 pm
Alsup of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued a third case management order in the remand proceedings of the Oracle v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
California, 505 U.S. 437, 439 (1992); see State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am
California and United States v. [read post]
