Search for: "California v. May"
Results 621 - 640
of 26,260
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2012, 9:28 pm
In the aftermath of Brown v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 6:08 am
By Michael Kun and Aaron Olsen To the surprise of few, the California Supreme Court has decided to review the Court of Appeal’s decision enforcing a class action waiver in Iskanian v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 5:00 am
However, a recent court case (Jewish Community Centers Development Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 3:29 pm
In effect, the federal pullback may be responsible for a California pushback. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 6:39 pm
On October 22, 2008, the California Supreme Court agreed to review the closely followed case of Brinker Restaurant v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 1:44 pm
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 12:51 pm
FINRA may deny an out of state attorney's request for qualification to participate in the arbitration if the non-California attorney has repeatedly appeared in California arbitration cases. [read post]
1 May 2012, 1:25 pm
In Kirby v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 1:06 pm
The California Supreme Court’s 2018 landmark decision, Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 8:07 am
In Skyline Wesleyan Church v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:10 am
The Ninth Circuit issued its decision in Clark v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 11:52 am
Inc v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 6:10 am
See Lealao v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 3:30 am
Two months ago, in Vardanyan v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
A trial court may consider only admissible expert opinion evidence on class certification, and there is only one standard for admissibility of expert opinion evidence in California. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 11:11 am
Magness v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 8:00 am
In Verdugo v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 4:52 pm
On April 6, 2017, in the matter Sharon McGill v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 5:53 am
S238544 – UNITED AUBURN INDIAN COMMUNITY OF THE AUBURN RANCHERIA v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 7:30 am
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc., Storm's California Employment Law suggests that something may be afoot in the legislature on the meal and rest break front -- even a change in the statute of limitations. [read post]
