Search for: "Cameron v State"
Results 621 - 640
of 928
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2013, 7:59 am
Furthermore, in a 2011 judgment on an immigration case from the Supreme Court, ZH (Tanzania) v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 1:28 pm
Assad also rebuked British Prime Minister David Cameron’s assertion that there were 70,000 moderate opposition fighters in Syria who would enable a political solution to the civil war and who retake territory from jihadist forces. [read post]
22 May 2021, 2:46 pm
The social events and legislative history leading to the enactment and promulgation of the NSL as a national law applied to the HKSAR under BL 18 have been summarised in HKSAR v Lai Chee Ying, ante. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 1:06 pm
The Texas v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 7:03 pm
” State ex rel Healey v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 10:30 am
In the June 8, 2015 ruling in Hill v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 1:58 pm
” The comment has sparked outcry from across the world, including from both British Prime Minister David Cameron and his French counterpart Manuel Valls. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
In State v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 11:36 pm
He hasn’t said no and what happened to Cameron’s Localism agenda? [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:39 am
John Edward Green, Jr., the defendant in Texas v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 12:47 pm
Prime Minister David Cameron had previously stated that it was “more likely than not” that a terrorist attack was responsible for the disaster. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 8:30 pm
Cameron Mutual v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 10:19 am
”); United States v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 5:00 am
In other tribunal news, the ECHR will begin hearings on an extraordinary rendition case today, Al Masri v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:08 pm
Kansas v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 5:34 pm
Other previously designated critical habitat for the wintering piping plover in Texas or elsewhere in the United States remains unaffected. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 8:06 am
David Cameron defended government plans, saying the government needed to take every step to keep the country safe. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 9:34 am
; Tweten v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 10:00 pm
R(Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice presented the UK Supreme Court with the question of whether compensation for miscarriage of justice should only be payable to someone was subsequently shown conclusively to have been innocent of the offence, or whether it should be open to anyone whose conviction has been declared unsafe. [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:08 pm
Reconsidering Privacy Choices: The Impact of Defaults, Reversibility, and Repetition, Cameron Kormylo, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University – Pamplin College of Business, Idris Adjerid, Pamplin College of Business. [read post]
