Search for: "Cash v. United States" Results 621 - 640 of 2,413
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2018, 4:01 am by Patricia Salkin
 Petitioners then initiated the present action and sought a declaratory judgment that “certain provisions of the Metropolitan Zoning Ordinance (“MZO”) violated their due process and equal protection rights under the Tennessee and United States constitutions. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 1:50 pm by John Floyd
United States had an opportunity to interpret the broad reach of the JVTA. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 7:02 am by Daniel Hemel
United States — imposes taxes on “compensation” paid by railroads to their workers. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger observes that United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 8:09 am
” There was another post only seconds later that read: “I hope she loses all her State and County Aid now that she has this cash. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 7:25 am by Sam Brunson
Reams, Inc., Internal Revenue Acts of the United States: The Revenue Act of 1954 with Legislative Histories and Congressional Documents at 1574-78.) [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:20 am by Matthias Weller
On 10 July 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rendered its judgment in the matter of Alan Philipps et al. v. the Federal Republic of Germany and the Stiftung Preussischer Kulturbesitz. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:32 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Volpe, 401 US 402, 415 (1971) (decision of the Secretary of Transportation comes with a “presumption of regularity” concerning “the official acts of public officers and, in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, courts presume that they have properly discharged their official duties”), and United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:32 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Volpe, 401 US 402, 415 (1971) (decision of the Secretary of Transportation comes with a “presumption of regularity” concerning “the official acts of public officers and, in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, courts presume that they have properly discharged their official duties”), and United States v. [read post]