Search for: "Center for Individual Freedom"
Results 621 - 640
of 3,659
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2023, 4:31 am
The FBI operates the Terrorist Screening Center (TSC). [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 11:29 am
U.S. and Chinese Policies Impact Global Internet Freedom Freedom House’s “Freedom on the Net 2020” report, released this week, rated China as having the world’s least free internet for the sixth year in a row. [read post]
7 May 2018, 2:20 am
York, EFF Director for International Freedom of Expression. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:48 pm
Support digital freedom defense today! [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:47 am
The amicus briefs: Senators Wyden, Udall and Heinrich Surveillance Experts PEN American Center Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press et al. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 11:34 am
The Thirteenth Amendment, for the first time in the Constitution’s history, gave Congress the express power to enforce the Constitution’s promise of freedom. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 3:00 am
Wikimedia alone engages in over a trillion Internet communications each year, with individuals located in virtually every country on earth. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 1:29 pm
Slowly we allowed personal rights and freedoms to erode in exchange for a false sense of security. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 9:31 pm
States should try to increase voter participation, but not by abridging the freedom of association. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 7:32 am
In this essay from the National Constitution Center’s Interactive Constitution project, scholars Nelson Lund and Adam Winkler look at the Second Amendment’s origins and the modern debates about it. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 2:45 pm
In First Unitarian Church, EFF represents 24 diverse organizations whose claims center on the fact that the NSA’s mass telephone records program also violates their First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and association. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 5:59 am
Politicians, museums, celebrities, and other high profile groups and individuals whose improperly removed content can garner media attention seem to have little trouble reaching Facebook to have content restored—they sometimes even receive an apology. [read post]
27 May 2016, 9:30 am
We’ve been fighting for nearly 100 years to protect religious freedom. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 9:19 am
Our lawsuit, filed today in Oklahoma state court with Americans United for Separation of Church and State, the Education Law Center, and the Freedom From Religion Foundation, takes a stand against the insidious efforts to co-opt public schools for private, religious interests. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 7:01 am
Marco Rubio (“While the clerk’s office has a governmental duty to carry out the law, there should be a way to protect the religious freedom and conscience rights of individuals working in the office”). [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 6:30 am
Attwood and Leslie Williams Professor of Law, Harvard Law School, and Faculty Director, Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology & Bioethics"Meticulously researched, engagingly written, and deeply relevant, Lewis Grossman begins with the question of therapeutic freedom in the early 21st century and traces a vital thread connecting two centuries of legal studies, consumer history, and American politics. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 5:23 am
The distinction, and the protection for legal but harmful speech, is a well-established global freedom of expression principle. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 5:16 am
Most of these elements raise conflicts between national and public interests and immigrants’ rights, including their basic human rights, their right to dignity and freedom. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 7:45 am
But it has two major shortcomings: individual voters have little chance of making a difference, and they face strong incentives to remain ignorant about the issues at stake. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 6:23 am
Its text offers no foothold for excluding any category of speaker, from single individuals to partnerships of individuals, to unincorporated associations of individuals, to incorporated associations of individuals-and the dissent offers no evidence about the original meaning of the text to support any such exclusion.A good deal more sensible than the position Thomas takes in Brown] [read post]
