Search for: "Close v. U. S"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,728
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2011, 2:12 pm
District Judge Royce Lamberth (Sierra Club v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:24 am
Smith v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 5:31 am
FCC, 512 U. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 2:41 pm
Swift & Co., 323 U. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
The unsigned majority opinion invoked the principle—previously articulated in a number of cases but most closely associated with Purcell v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 12:34 pm
Applying the Supreme Court’s seminal 1984 decision in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 2:01 pm
The court also allowed the government to introduce evidence of Hicks's two prior drug convictions at the close of its case-in-chief over Hicks's renewed objection. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 6:15 am
United States, 315 U. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
Sassower v. 975 Stewart Avenue Associates, LLC, 2009 NY Slip Op 31901(U) (Sup Ct Nassau County Aug. 14, 2009), recently decided by Nassau County Commercial Division Justice Ira B. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 10:51 am
Today in United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 7:59 am
In the recent case (Stanikzai v. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 5:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:48 am
Arizona, 520 U. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 3:30 am
Let’s start with the statutes. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:09 pm
S. 573 (1986); and Baldwin v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 3:00 am
Reginald Pittman v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:31 am
Allen, 247 F.3d 741, 768 (8th Cir.2001) (ultimately, dispositive question is "whether Congress clearly intended to impose cumulative sentences for simultaneous violations of each of the statutes"), vacated and remanded for reconsideration on other grounds, 536 U .S. 953 (2002). [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 11:23 am
” Plaintiffs further claim the federal defendants agree with their position, citing to BOEM’s prior statement that “even if and when the federal suspension is lifted – the cancellation of NJBP[U]’s easements and permit precludes construction of the project” and that without easements “Ocean Wind 1 cannot proceed. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 3:46 pm
That was the summary ruling in Baker v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 11:52 am
Kelly Land Company, L.L.C. v. [read post]
