Search for: "Conflict of Interest - Divorce Actions" Results 621 - 640 of 1,028
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2023, 4:44 am by Peter Mahler
When a member of a New York LLC brings an action for judicial dissolution, as far as the dissolution statute, Section 702, is concerned, the outcome presents the court with a binary choice: dissolve or don’t dissolve. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 7:43 pm
Friedman, Jack Himmelstein, and Norman Fischer in a program entitled "Self-Reflection in Action: Using Our Inner Selves to Help People In Conflict". [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 5:00 am
Force your child to choose a side whise scheduling conflicts occur. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 4:57 am by Peter Mahler
In July 2018, Gluck brought an action in this Court to rescind the Amendment on the grounds of fraud, want of consideration, and mutual mistake, and alleged breach of contract and fiduciary duty in connection with the appraisal process. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 12:49 pm by Daniel Richardson
  Several weeks into the romance, while looking over the client list at the Burlington law firm where she worked, she discovered that her firm represented the soon-to-be ex-wife of her beau in the pending divorce action. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 3:26 am by Peter Mahler
Turchin the right to decide by majority vote whether to file a direct action against the Mendelow parties. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 6:56 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Nor did the respondent fully disclose his inherent conflict of interest. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 9:39 am by Aaron Weems
 The Rachel Foundation strives to overcome, among other forms of abuse, the "abduction of the mind" which may occur in "high-conflict divorce. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 4:38 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The defendant, Varughese, owned 8% of the membership interests and served as its managing member. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
  It would recognize that corporations cannot be fully divorced from the political and profit pursuits of the people that manage them. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:00 am by Giesela Ruehl
Qisheng He, The EU Conflict of Laws Communitarization and the Modernization of Chinese Private International Law, pp. 47-85 Abstract: Since 2007 the EU has adopted the Rome I, Rome II and Rome III Council Regulations codifying and unifying the respective conflict of laws rules in contract, tort and divorce and legal separation. [read post]
10 May 2013, 4:42 am by Susan Brenner
Getting back to Detweiler, on July 26, 2011 the Court’s Office of Disciplinary Counsel charged him “with engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law by soliciting a client for sexual favors and continuing to represent the client despite the substantial risk that his own personal interests conflicted with those of the client. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 11:00 am by Marsha Tesar
Who will be interested in the home (or more interested in your portfolio)? [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 11:00 am by Marsha Tesar
Who will be interested in the home (or more interested in your portfolio)? [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Other states would presumably respond and try to figure out the best way to alleviate the problem through some kind of collective action. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 7:39 am by Law Lady
She had trouble sleeping and eating.Dissolution of marriage -- Alimony -- Error to fail to award retroactive alimony dating back to date dissolution petition was filed and to fail to award prejudgment interest on husband's alimony arrearage -- Trial court's finding that award of retroactive alimony would overlap with temporary alimony award failed to account for interim between date dissolution petition was filed and date temporary award was enteredBILLIE LUTZ GREMEL, Appellant,… [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 9:59 pm by Colin Rule
Our actions matter, and can bend history in the direction of justice. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 1:19 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A New York Divorce Lawyer said on November 15, 1989, counsel for the plaintiffs and the DHCR entered into a stipulation which provided that the November 13, 1989 Order to Show Cause would not be construed to preclude the DHCR from taking ministerial actions necessary to comply with the procedures required for the promulgation of the regulatory amendments, which are the subject of this action, such as the filing of required Regulatory Impact Statements and Regulatory… [read post]