Search for: "Cooper v. United States of America"
Results 621 - 640
of 743
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2010, 7:39 am
Coton v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 7:05 am
United States Potato Growers of Idaho Inc., et al., No. 10-CV-307-BLW) and the Northern District of California (Marvilla v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 11:53 pm
But marijuana is now, and will remain for some time to come, illegal throughout the United States of America and there are courts of the United States of America in California. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:36 am
He seeks to make it easier to remove foreclosure defense actions from state to federal court, ending state court limited jurisdiction. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 3:53 am
Under the Ker-Frisbie doctrine – and as approved more recently in United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm
– ASA rules competition promoters can offer third party products as prizes without consent (IPKat) The UK is still in the IP thought leadership game (IAM) United States US General US/UK Intellectual Property Office statement on cooperation (Patent Baristas) USPTO year in review – and a look forward (Director’s Forum) NASA needs you! [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
The three sources of international law are stated and defined in the Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (R3dFRLUS), Section 102. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am
United States, 129 S. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 6:20 pm
" United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
– United States Environmental Protection Agency, July 26, 2010 Rhode Island Airport Corporation and its demolition contractors, O.R. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 1:12 pm
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 10:31 am
John Cooper. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 6:33 am
See Kiobel v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:46 am
In the first, Cooper Cameron v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
Applera Corp (Patently-O) (271 Patent Blog) District Court S D Indiana: Stay pending reexam lifted prior to issuance of reexam certificate (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: United States is not an indispensible party to false marking action: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:16 pm
The bill's focus, as it's title implies, is on reauthorizing the America COMPETES Act passed in 2007. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:36 pm
Circuit’s recent decision in Comcast v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:24 am
As a common law principle, the banking sector has long functioned under the value of confidentiality, largely embodied in the famous 1924 United Kingdom decision, Tournier v. [read post]
