Search for: "Cost v. State" Results 621 - 640 of 31,577
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am by David Pocklington
Ormondroyd Ch was unconvinced by the justification, stating: “[20]. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 11:00 pm
INACTION RESULTED IN FORECLOSURE’S DISMISSALWhen a motion to vacate the judgment of foreclosure (which had been entered on default), and to dismiss the action, was denied by the New York County Supreme Court, an appeal ensued.And on its review of the record, the Appellate Division, First Department, thought the court below had committed reversible error since the bank had violated state law – CPLR 3215(c) -- by waiting some four years to seek entry of the default.To that end,… [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 3:29 pm by Stuart Kaplow
Of note, there are similar industry managed programs elsewhere, but the legislature heard they are expensive and this will increase the cost of paint in Maryland. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 1973) (holding that Section 6(g) “empowered [the FTC] to promulgate substantive rules of business conduct”); United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:45 am by Unknown
Update on UK's “Safety of Rwanda” Bill:"UK Parliament approves Rwanda deportation bill, ending weeks of legislative stalemate," AP News, 22 April 2024 [text]UK: Airlines and aviation authorities should not facilitate unlawful removals to Rwanda, UN experts say (OHCHR, 22 April 2024) [text]The obstacles that could still stop flights to Rwanda from taking off (The Conversation, 23 April 2024) [text]Passing of the Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill met with… [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 8:07 am by John Timmer
The rules came in response to a Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 2:37 am by Mark Schickman, Schickman Law
The trial court granted fees of only $513,963 and $39,943 in costs. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:52 am by Giles Peaker
Further, applying RR v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2019] UKSC 52 it was possible to disapply the discriminatory parts of the regulations to give JA a remedy without her needing to make a separate human rights claim. [read post]