Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 621 - 640 of 16,690
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
Bank National Association v Langner, 168 AD3d 1021 [2d Dept 2019])” The Court observed that CPLR § 2309 sets forth the way oaths and affirmations are to be administered and notes in section (c) regarding oaths and affirmations taken without the state: An oath or affirmation taken without the state shall be treated as if taken within the state if it is accompanied by such certificate or certificates as would be required to entitle a deed acknowledged… [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:00 am by Barbara Pfeffer Billauer
Because the condition involved two competing fields of science, medicine and biomechanics, the court ruled the proponent must establish cross-disciplinary validation to establish reliability. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 4:54 am by Beatrice Yahia
” Hagari also said more than 100,000 people have fled their homes in southern Lebanon amid the cross-border violence. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:28 am by Tom Miller
The judge reasoned that the ability to exercise a fundamental constitutional right could not shift so dramatically just because the defendant crossed a state line. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 4:59 am by Frank Cranmer
Cross-disciplinary and comparative papers are particularly welcomed. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 11:41 am by NARF
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (Tribal Contract Health; Discovery) United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am by Beatrice Yahia
State Department, Matthew Miller, said today. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm by Sara Notario
First, the Court is competent to review restrictive measures adopted under Article 29 TEU, within the meaning of the CJEU case law (i.e., measures of individual scope of application; see Ben Ali v Council, para. 145) in the annulment procedure (Article 263(4) TFEU). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:58 am by Peter Mahler
Last month, in Flor v Greenberg Farrow Architectural Inc., a three-judge panel of the New Jersey Appellate Division handed down an opinion with important lessons for business owners and practitioners in states that have adopted the Revised Uniform LLC Act, such as New Jersey, as well as in states that haven’t, such as New York. [read post]