Search for: "Cross v. Superior Court"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,408
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2016, 12:57 pm
In arriving at this conclusion, the court applied the principles stated by the Supreme Court of Canada in Commonwealth Construction Co. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:00 am
Nordstrom California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) CA Court Confirms that Pineda v Williams-Sonoma (the Zip-Code-as-PII Case) Applies Retrospectively — Dardarian v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:35 am
This post is cross-posted at Text and History. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:51 pm
Nordstrom California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) CA Court Confirms that Pineda v Williams-Sonoma (the Zip-Code-as-PII Case) Applies Retrospectively — Dardarian v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 11:04 am
In a recent decision, the Ontario Superior Court ruled that an employer had wrongfully dismissed a 65 year old manager of a used car company. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 1:03 pm
Father’s position was sustained by both the trial and Superior Courts. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 7:29 am
Most satisfying judicial decision (personal case load division): After approximately five years of litigation, including a week long jury trial, convincing the Pennsylvania Superior Court (for those of you not familiar with that state’s court system, the Superior Court is its intermediate appellate court) to not just reverse a $1.4 million verdict against my client, but to also enter judgment in favor of my client. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
App. 16 (1985), the Court held that: [t]he scope of an arbitration award and its res judicata effect are matters for judicial determination; therefore, whether plaintiff's claims are barred was for the superior court to determine. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 5:30 am
In the Lebanon County Court of Common Pleas case of Shearer v. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
Superior Court in California. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 7:30 pm
Such was the story in Actavis v Lilly. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 12:37 pm
” Earlier this month, in Braman v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 10:24 am
CSIRO v. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 5:38 am
” Ben applied for Estonian e-residency after the Economist’s Edward Lucas asserted the superiority of Estonia’s cybersecurity during the third Hoover Book Soiree. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 5:34 pm
EverBank v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 10:34 am
Superior Court (1973) 34 CA3d 794, 797, the Court of Appeal found that discovery may continue after a demurrer has been sustained with leave to amend, although an amended complaint had not yet been filed. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 10:34 am
Superior Court (1973) 34 CA3d 794, 797, the Court of Appeal found that discovery may continue after a demurrer has been sustained with leave to amend, although an amended complaint had not yet been filed. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 9:56 am
In this case, after discovery and hearing cross motions for summary judgment, the superior court granted summary judgment in favor of contractor. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 5:04 pm
In a 65-page opinion certified for publication and filed October 22, 2015, the Second Appellate District Court of Appeal affirmed the Los Angeles County Superior Court’s judgment denying writ petitions by the City of Beverly Hills (“City”) and the Beverly Hills Unified School District (“District”). [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 9:09 am
Indeed, the Third District Court of Appeal in Pulido v. [read post]
