Search for: "D. Carrol" Results 621 - 640 of 677
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2010, 4:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Ho; JD 1999 Harvard University; MPP 1999 Harvard Kennedy School of Government; Fellowship O'Neill Institute Georgetown University; Health Law Reid Kress Weisbord; JD 2006 University of Pennsylvania; ; United States District Court, United States Court of Appeals; Saint Louis University Kirsten Nussbaumer; JD 2000 Stanford University; MA, PhD 2010 Stanford Political Science; Visiting Assistant Professor University of Minnesota; United States District Court; Constitutional History, Election Law… [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
United States, 73 F.R.D. 364, 367, judgment aff’d 578 F.2d 414 (C.A.D.C.1978). [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
, (Intellectual Property Watch), (Out-Law), (Electronic Frontier Foundation), The UK High Court allows computer program patent claims in Astron Clinica & Ors v The Comptroller: (IPKat), (BLOG@IP::JUR), (Filemot), (IAM), (The IP Factor), (IP Updates), (IMPACT), (IPcentral Weblog), (Out-Law), (IPBiz),Tarceva (Erlotinib) - Roche patent infringement action against CIPLA before Delhi High Court: Many posts at: (Spicy IP) and… [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
Box 1241 Oshkosh, WI 54902-1241 Phone: (920) 424-4071; (800) 261-1895 (Toll Free in WI) TTY: (920) 424-4071 E-mail: cpmideastwi@vbe.com Web: http://www.cpmideastwis.org Cystic Fibrosis Wisconsin Cystic Fibrosis Chapter 20875 Crossroads Circle, Suite 350 Waukesha, WI 53186 Phone: (262) 798-2060; (800) 472-7720 (Toll Free) Fax: (262) 798-2065 E-mail: wisconsin@cff.org Web: http://www.cff.org/wisconsin.htm Wisconsin Cystic Fibrosis Chapter -- Fox Valley Branch 2616 South Oneida Street, Suite 4… [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 8:10 am by Andrew Delaney
Something about the acronyms in these cases makes me think that they’d read well over a Dr. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 2:46 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Even so, they haven’t given themselves permission to dream as big as fair use is—we asked what they’d do if they had no copyright concerns at all, and most of the answers would be ok under fair use. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am by Gustavo Arballo
Bolton fue resuelto el mismo día y las opiniones deben leerse juntas (y, de hecho, se "citan" entre si). [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 11:02 am by Kevin Kaufman
Ron Wyden (D-OR) unveiled a mark-to-market proposal[1] to tax capital gains at the end of each year. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 7:25 am by Juan C. Antúnez
Declaratory judgment actions can be extremely useful tools for probate practitioners; they’re expressly authorized by statute in F.S. 86.041 and F.S. 736.0201(4)(f), and they’re incredibly flexible, often providing the only means to adjudicate a problematic clause that’s contained within an otherwise perfectly valid will. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
[Professor Shugerman's argument that the 1793 Hamilton Document, that is, a list of "every person holding any civil office or employment under the United States, (except the judges)," was intended to ensure compliance with the Constitution's Sinecure Clause lacks support.] [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 10:35 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Western Georgia Resolution Agreement and Corrective Action Plan (“Resolution Agreement”) OCR announced on December 30, 2019 resolves charges resulting from an OCR investigation initiated in response to a HIPAA breach report the Georgia based ambulance company filed in 2013 in which the company, which provides emergency and non-emergency ambulance services in Carroll County, Georgia,  disclosed the loss of an unencrypted laptop containing the protected health… [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 4:40 am by Beatrice Yahia
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 4:36 am by Emma Snell
Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), a member of the committee who was present during the interview, said Cipollone didn’t invoke his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
Moreover, the exercise of constitutional rights “may be regulated by the Oireachtas when the common good requires this” (Ryan v Attorney General [1965] IR 294, 312 (HC; Kenny J) affd [1965] IR 294, 345, [1965] IESC 1 (3 July 1965) [23] (Ó Dálaigh CJ; Lavery, Kingsmill Moore, Haugh and Walsh JJ concurring); see, recently, Burke v Minister for Education [2022] IESC 1 (24 January 2022) [95] (O’Donnell CJ)). [read post]