Search for: "DAVIS v. DAVIS" Results 621 - 640 of 8,976
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2022, 10:08 am by Scott Hervey
Ziff Davis from the Central District of New York. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts tried (obviously unsuccessfully) to avoid the complete overturning of Roe v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Supreme Court (No. 21-418) (February 28, 2022)).Lael Daniel Weinberger, Carson v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 10:55 am by Giles Peaker
Pile v Pile (2022) EWHC 2036 (Ch) The High Court confirms that Procter v Procter (2022) EWHC 1202 (Ch) is authority for the proposition that it is not a breach of trust for one joint tenant to give notice to quit on the joint tenancy, even where this is done for the purposes of obtaining a new sole tenancy for themselves alone. in a case where a party is a trustee only by reason of their co-ownership with another joint tenant under a periodic tenancy (i.e., in the language of… [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 8:55 am
Today's advance release property law opinion: Davis v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In 1889 SCOTUS defined religion in Davis v Beason, making reference to Madison, as follows: ‘The term “religion” has reference to one's views of his relations to his Creator, and to the obligations they impose of reverence for his being and character, and of obedience to his will’. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 9:20 am
Today's advance release criminal law opinion: State v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Thomas in Support of Petitioners in Dobbs v. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 12:45 am by INFORRM
 Smith v TalkTalk Telecom Group plc [2022] EWHC 1311 (QB) (27 May 2022) concerned claims for damages for both breaches; whilst Sterritt v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2022] NIQB 43 (09 June 2022) concerned the privacy of one of the hackers involved in the second breach. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
But it is an open question whether the transferor might still be secondarily liable (see, eg, Paul S Davies Accessory Liability (Hart Publishing, 2017) chapter 6). [read post]