Search for: "DOE individuals 1-10" Results 621 - 640 of 14,772
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2009, 2:55 pm
NLRB Law Memo 04/10/2009 by LawMemo - First in Employment Law. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:25 pm
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado: SECTION 1. 18-1-102.5 (1) (c) and (1) (d), Colorado Revised Statutes, are amended, and the said 18-1-102.5 (1) is further amended BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW PARAGRAPH, to read: 18-1-102.5. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:47 am by Marty Lederman
  Later that day, by a 2-1 vote, it stayed those portions of the injunction that prohibited HHS from preventing others from transporting Doe to a facility for the abortion and “from interfering with or obstructing J.D. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:31 pm by Bill Marler
Marler Clark has also filed four individual lawsuits in Ohio. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 5:37 am by Jon L. Gelman
As pled, the fibers traveled on the clothes of persons who worked with asbestos, and the fibers posed a danger to individuals who breathed in the asbestos dust in the home environment. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 7:00 am by Jonathan I. Nirenberg
The law, which will not go into effect until March 1, 2015, permits employers to ask an individual about his or her criminal history once they decide the individual is their first choice for a position. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The board does not agree with this statement. [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:46 pm
Previously, paper checks cost taxpayers $120 million per year, and it is expected the new system will save $1 billion over the next 10 years. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 10:56 am by Daniel Shaviro
In this 10-person set-up, I get to keep only $10 from the increased demogrant.Again, the Kantian's motivation is not that maybe other people will in fact work more, too, if she does. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 6:36 am by Brad Hokanson
 The Amnesty Penalty (5%) imposed on taxes due on or after 1/1/2002 and before 2/1/2009 is still applicable. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
And so Google’s helpful new online tool for making requests for personal data to be blocked from its search results may help it to comply with notices to prevent processing made under section 10 of the DPA, but it does not necessarily help Google to avoid claims for damages. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
However, the "date of hire" might not necessarily be the same date used to determine an individual's service for seniority purposes for layoff under State law, i.e., the individual's date of initial permanent appointment in public service.For example, assume Employee A was provisionally appointed on January 1, and Employee B was appointed February 1, of the same year. [read post]