Search for: "DOES 1-98 " Results 621 - 640 of 2,167
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2009, 8:55 am
What makes this case unusual is that the fan-made mod had been in development since 2004 and was 98% complete according to its makers. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 1:47 pm
  In a state where 98% of all criminal dispositions are the result of plea bargains, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to contemplate the likely impact of LWOP. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 10:48 pm
Seasons and cycles are attributes of the plant protection market that make this measure particularly difficult to implement and in some cases totally impracticable.On this account, AUDACE had, on 9 May sought, from the national competent authorities and from industry, that they agree with parallel importers on the conditions in which double labelling and repackaging could take place in accordance with industrial and commercial property rights and the preservation of their essential… [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 2:15 pm by HL Chronicle of Data Protection
The vote was 288-127, with 196 Republicans and 92 Democrats in favor, and 29 Republicans and 98 Democrats opposed—and thus the House vote would be sufficient to override any presidential veto. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 8:25 pm by ebcarpenter
If the offender was previously convicted of a violation of R.S. 14:98, then at least 5 years of the sentence of imprisonment shall be imposed without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence.   [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:53 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Moreover, the defendant asserts that the allegation that the child suffered "substantial pain" is uncorroborated hearsay and does not indicate that the child was injured as a result of his actions. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 8:05 am by Jordan Dulcie
While Florida has a “no fault” insurance law that limits drivers’ and passengers’ financial recoveries in some cases, this limitation does not apply to cases involving serious and fatal injuries. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 4:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In February 2017, Cedeno and his firm filed an answer and a counterclaim for defamation alleging, among other things, that Atesta P falsely stated that Cedeno raped her (NYSCEF # 98, ~~225-230). [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
  June 1, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Domestic Relations Law  253 does not provide that a defendant must provide plaintiff with a GetIn Cohen v Cohen, ‑‑‑ N.Y.S.3d ‑‑‑‑, 2019 WL 2112972, 2019 N.Y. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 3:34 am
Article 2 sub c of the Framework Directive (2002/21/EC), which contains some of the general definitions for the regulatory framework, explicitly excludes services providing or exercising editorial control over content:"Electronic communications service" means a service normally provided for remuneration which consists wholly or mainly in the conveyance of signals on electronic communications networks, including telecommunications services and transmission services in networks used for… [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 6:52 am by Salmonella Lawyer
., found that, depending on the level of surface contamination, mechanical tenderization of beef products transferred E. coli O157:H7 into the topmost 1 cm of product in 90% to 100% of samples and into the topmost 2 cm of product in 55% to 98% of samples. [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 2:02 am by Eleonora Rosati
In that case, the CJEU held (at [98]) that:sporting events cannot be regarded as intellectual creations classifiable as works within the meaning of the Copyright Directive. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 4:56 pm
(Enlarged Board of Appeal in G2/98).Priority can be lost by:narrowing down the disclosure from the priority document in a manner which the invention could not be derived directly and unambiguously from it (Pharmacia Corp v Merck & Co Inc [2002] RPC 41); orwidening or generalizing from the priority disclosure (Beloit Technologies Inc and another v Valmet Paper Machinery Inc and another [1995] RPC 7005 and Unilin)The story continues in Part II. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 8:05 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
New limitations on designs rights (Art. 18(1) Draft Directive, Art. 20(1) Design Regulation). [read post]