Search for: "Daves v State"
Results 621 - 640
of 740
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Today in the United States it is also Memorial Day, a day in which we remember those soldiers who have died in service to our country. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 8:25 am
The Supreme Court held in Massachusetts v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 10:28 am
In Monroe v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 10:22 am
The case, Quon v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 1:03 pm
Dave Camp of Michigan, the top Republican on the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 1:50 pm
Try "[your keyword] Jerge v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 10:41 am
(For some thoughts on the legacy of Olech see this old post by Dave Fagundes.) [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 10:24 am
Horan issued a November 5, 2009 Opinion and Order in the post-Koken case of Baptiste v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 6:02 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
Schwartz "Ashcroft v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
In a strongly worded order issued last week, a district judge overturned a 2008 state ruling that granted the authority permission to tap groundwater from three valleys in central Lincoln County. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 10:58 am
By James Pugh & Dave Lanferman On October 22, 2009, the California Supreme Court decided not to review the Court of Appeal's decision in the landmark Palmer/Sixth Street Properties v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:48 am
No. 7205/02), McCann v UK (App. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
Brinker and Dukes v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:45 pm
Guggenheim v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:53 am
Fido's Fences, Inc (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC reverses TTAB’s Bose fraud ruling, eviscerates Medinol: In re Bose Corporation (TTABlog) (TTABlog) (Intellectual Property Law Blog) (IPKat) (Patently-O) (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) 9th Circuit finds in favour of Paris Hilton in her suit against Hallmark Cards for violating her right of publicity and using her THAT’S HOT registered trademark without permission: Hilton v… [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 1:53 pm
R (Van Boolen) v London Borough of Barking & Dagenham [2009] EWHC 2196 (Admin) Last in our series of updates is Boolen v Barking & Dagenham. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 12:09 am
Here is a comparison of North v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 9:01 pm
” The case cite is Custom Auto Interiors, Inc. v. [read post]
