Search for: "David W. Favor" Results 621 - 640 of 675
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Musk[6]  looked beyond a bright-line test of equity ownership percentage in deciding whether a CEO had “control;” and  W. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
Douglas Melamed and Andrew W. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
MSN – Tobi Raji (Washington Post) | Published: 9/23/2024 Leaders of the federal court system and some members of Congress are trying to limit the practice of judge shopping – when a person or group files a lawsuit in a carefully chosen court where they believe the judge will be inclined to rule in their favor. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 6:03 am by Lyle Denniston
But, the Circuit Court said, the Constitution’s Election Clause strikes a different balance, giving Congress the final word over election procedures for federal officers, without any presumption in favor of state powers. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
A forthcoming article surveys recent arguments in favor of scaling back or eliminating judicial doctrines under which federal courts defer to agency interpretations. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Our standards are modest and consistent with others’; it’s just that the individual standards favor the company. [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 1:03 pm by Dr. Adam Feldman
What do five Biden, two Obama, one George W. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 6:13 am by Ryan Goodman
In a civil case earlier this month, federal district court judge David O. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm by Ryan Goodman
He writes that “a court decision (or, perhaps, a state legislative determination) rendered after December 14 in favor of the Trump-Pence slate of electors should be considered timely” for the counting of electoral votes on Jan. 6 (emphasis added). [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 3:14 am by Matthias Weller
HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention Repository   In preparation of the Conference on the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention on 9/10 September 2022, taking place on campus of the University of Bonn, Germany, we are offering here a Repository of contributions to the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Virginia Journal of International Law, Forthcoming, Univ. of Wisconsin Legal Studies Research Jason W. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
Recently, the Second Circuit issued a significant Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) decision construing the FOIA exemption covering law enforcement records that “would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions, or would disclose guidelines for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law,” 5 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
The asymmetries run beyond the usual problem of state subsidies to that of states being tempted to tilt markets in favor of SOEs (producing a sort of systemic corruption in markets driven systems) to issues of interference with sovereignty when SOEs serve as the apex enterprise in global production chains.[18] The legal status of SOEs varies from being a part of government to stock companies with a state as a regular stockholder.[19] But its purpose has remained constant—national… [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 5:30 am by Dan Carvajal
Most sales tax holidays involve politicians picking products and industries to favor with exemptions, arbitrarily discriminating among products and across time, and distorting consumer decisions. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Steve Lombardi
       COURT DOCKET Filings Title: V GRIFFEN VS STATE OF IOWA Case: 01071 LACV096157 (BLACK HAWK) Citation Number: Event Filed By Filed Create Date Last Updated Action Date OTHER ORDER STAUDT DAVID F 03/27/2012 03/28/2012 03/28/2012        Comments: APPROVING SETTLEMENT OTHER APPLICATION MOELLER JOANNE 03/27/2012 03/28/2012 03/28/2012   … [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
In the SG’s view, “[w]hether this court’s review is warranted presents a closer question” because such issues do not “arise[] with great frequency. [read post]