Search for: "David v. State" Results 621 - 640 of 14,158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on David Schleicher, In a Bad State: Responding to State and Local Budget Crises (Oxford University Press, 2023).David SchleicherFirst, I’d just like to thank everyone involved in this symposium. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
This post comes to us from Anna Bergman Brown at Clarkson University’s David D. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 6:38 pm by Mark Ashton
An appeal to the 3rd Circuit followed as did New York State Rifle Association, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:32 am by Patricia Hughes
The test in Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 5:16 am by Ashley Deeks, Matthew Waxman
The Supreme Court has offered snippets of its view on this in some cases, stating in Fleming v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:56 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” Uncertainty After Culligan In a number of post-Culligan decisions, plaintiffs often argued, and lower courts generally rejected, the notion that Culligan impliedly overruled prior case law applying the laws of the state of incorporation to shareholder derivative standing: David Shaev Profit Sharing Plan v Bank of Am. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Strang, A Light Unseen: The History of Catholic Legal Education in the United States: A Response to Our Colleagues and Critics, 59 Journal of Catholic Legal Studies 1-50 (2020).David. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  [1] See David Schleicher, In A Bad State 145-46 (2023).[2] David Schleicher, In A Bad State 145 (2023).[3] 418 U.S. 717 (1974).[4] See Christopher J. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
Since the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in New York Times v Sullivan in 1964, it has been extremely difficult for plaintiffs with any public profile to sue for defamation in the United States. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  But the language of the opinions was often much loftier, as when the Court said, in Wolff v. [read post]