Search for: "Davies v. United States"
Results 621 - 640
of 2,778
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm
For those who haven’t looked at that Amendment recently, its words provide, quite straightforwardly, that, for citizens of the United States who are at least eighteen, the right to vote “shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any state on account of age” (emphasis added).Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Texas grant absentee-voting eligibility specifically for all voters sixty-five or older, while… [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:40 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
The proposed Idaho Memorial (which would need to be approved on the floor of both houses of the state legislature before it would take effect) provides in part: We, your Memorialists, the House of Representatives and the Senate of the State of Idaho assembled in the First Regular Session of the Sixty-eighth Idaho Legislature, do hereby respectfully represent that: WHEREAS, the decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in Obergefell v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
The case is United States ex rel. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 8:11 am
United States is, ultimately, a simple case. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 8:14 am
United States), a “State may constitutionally withdraw the authority of state officers to enforce federal law. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 12:56 pm
” Unlike the Davis trial, Texas v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 4:26 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
By contrast, the work of a city council, in most of the towns and cities of the United States, regularly deals with decisions affecting small groups and individuals. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 12:09 am
See United States v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 1:57 pm
Renhcol Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 9:28 am
In United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 4:56 am
’ Davis v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 7:30 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit grants rehearing en banc to reconsider the amount of restitution that a district court may order a defendant convicted of possessing child pornography to pay to children depicted in the images: Today, the Fifth Circuit posted online this order issued Wednesday granting rehearing en banc in the case captioned United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 2:30 pm
District Court for the District of ColumbiaCourtroom 18, 6th Floor333 Constitution Avenue N.W.Washington D.C. 20001For more on this case:https://www.eff.org/cases/woodhull-freedom-foundation-et-al-v-united-statesFor the motion for preliminary injunction:https://www.eff.org/document/woodhull-freedom-foundation-et-al-v-united-states-motion-preliminary-injunction-and Contact: DavidGreeneCivil Liberties Directordavidg@eff.org … [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 11:59 pm
If the name Javier Velez seems remotely familiar to visitors to this site, it is because he is one of the officers Lumer & Neville received a $560,000 verdict against in Davis v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 11:59 pm
If the name Javier Velez seems remotely familiar to visitors to this site, it is because he is one of the officers Lumer & Neville received a $560,000 verdict against in Davis v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 2:27 pm
United States on Monday. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 11:58 pm
United States, 541 U.S. 600 (2004) [read post]
