Search for: "Davis v. Strong" Results 621 - 640 of 669
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2008, 3:24 am
This Kansas team may not be as strong on offense as in 2007 whereas the defense is nearly intact. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 4:27 pm
Biden, a 30-plus-year veteran of the senate, has been a strong supporter of civil liberties. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
E. coli bacteria: what are they, where did they come from, and why are some so dangerous? [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 4:29 pm
Rob Hofmann is an associate with Abbott & Kindermann, LLP, and is a member of the City of Davis Planning Commission, and a member of the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Hearing Board. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
The following list of the situation in other European countries was provided by the European Court of Human Rights in its decision to reject the UK Government's appeal against the ECHR's judgment in the case of Hirst v the United Kingdom:Prisoners may vote in 16 countries: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina (unless serving a sentence imposed by the International Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia), Cyprus (though they must happen to be out of prison on the day of the elections)… [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 3:29 pm
For April, there are four opinions remaining:   Plains Commerce (involving Indian tribes), Kennedy (death penalty for child rape), Davis v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:09 am
Davis (2001) -- prohibiting indefinite detention of immigrants under final orders of removal where no other country will accept themEasley v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:22 pm
Parke, Davis & Co., 657 F.2d 642 (4th Cir. 1981). [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 1:14 pm
The reason for the pervasive skepticism during the hour-long argument in Davis v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 5:01 pm
They are especially strong for people who are not famous and might have reasonable expectation to remain that way. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 12:08 pm
Davis v Kentucky Dept of revenue involves the right of states to provide tax exemptions only for their own bonds, discriminating against bonds issued by other states. [read post]