Search for: "Defenders of Wildlife" Results 621 - 640 of 1,417
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2015, 8:54 am by Eric Goldman
It’s not just that the defendant directed activity towards a state; the claim must relate to that activity. [read post]
6 May 2015, 9:41 am by Cassie Preston
  The defendant, the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, filed a Motion for Summary Judgment before the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana alleging there was no admiralty jurisdiction because the collision did not occur on navigable waters. [read post]
5 May 2015, 9:02 am by WIMS
     The Eastern District of Louisiana as part of the Deepwater Horizon multidistrict litigation,  in September 2013 granted summary judgment to the defendants saying the Mexican states did not hold a sufficient "proprietary interest" in the allegedly damaged property. [read post]
1 May 2015, 12:02 pm by Ingrid Wuerth
Defenders of Wildlife held that Congress cannot create standing for private plaintiffs who suffer only a generalized injury, that limitation applied in neither Zivotofsky  nor Spokeo, because in both cases the plaintiffs alleged a particularized injury. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 6:37 pm
Spiders are not inherently dangerous, and even venomous spiders will bite only to defend themselves, but spiders can be scary. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 3:10 pm by David Miller
”  Prior to the Service’s listing decision, the Defenders of Wildlife claimed that the amendment could block, perhaps permanently, any decision to list the bat. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 9:14 am by Mary Whisner
Many are from organizations, for exampleSeth Waxman submitted a letter on behalf of the appellate practice groups of several large law firms (including his own firm, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP).EarthJustice, Sierra Club, Defenders of Wildlife, and Western Environmental Law Center submitted joint comments.The American Academy of Appellate Lawyers also weighed in, approving changes to other rules but not Rule 32.Judge Frank Easterbrook (7th Cir.) [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 8:59 am by WIMS
Michigan News <> Wolf Supporters File Suit Challenging Law Intended to Undermine the Will of Michigan Voters - Keep Michigan Wolves Protected filed a lawsuit in Lansing in the Michigan Court of Claims to overturn the so-called Scientific Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act on the grounds that it violates the state's constitution. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:34 am by Mary Whisner
Many are from organizations, for exampleSeth Waxman submitted a letter on behalf of the appellate practice groups of several large law firms (including his own firm, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP).EarthJustice, Sierra Club, Defenders of Wildlife, and Western Environmental Law Center submitted joint comments.The American Academy of Appellate Lawyers also weighed in, approving changes to other rules but not Rule 32.Judge Frank Easterbrook (7th Cir.) wrote supporting the… [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:11 am by Naomi Roht-Arriaza
Many human rights defenders have been attacked while defending their communities and land. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 1:36 pm
In a recent case near Jacksonville, Florida, a Fish and Wildlife Department officer observed the defendant violating the wake free zone with his boat. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 12:45 pm by Howard Friedman
 In a November 2012 decision (see prior posting) the district court rejected a challenge under RFRA by the Northern Arapaho Tribe to a limitation in a Fish and Wildlife Service permit that allowed them to take two bald eagles for religious purposes in Wyoming, but not on the Wind River Reservation that they share with the Eastern Shoshone tribe. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 3:54 pm by Jamie Markham
The closest thing we have, I think, is the special condition of probation requiring a defendant to pay DENR or the Wildlife Resources Commission for any reward they paid. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 10:02 am by Kelly Percival
In other words, Defendants argued that the project falls outside the geographic scope of section 7, which only applies to actions within the territory of the United States and “upon the high seas. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 12:25 pm by Lyle Denniston
Yates had been prosecuted for destroying “tangible objects” after a fish and wildlife officer boarded his boat and found a number of undersized red grouper. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 10:22 am
Earthjustice, Sierra Club, Defenders of Wildlife, and Western Environmental Law Center submitted this public comment opposing the word limit reduction proposal. [read post]