Search for: "Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs" Results 621 - 640 of 3,914
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2014, 7:02 pm
Also, it does not appear that either of the plaintiffs notified the County Treasurer of their claim of ownership or directed that the Treasurer send future tax bills to them. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 3:52 pm
Notably, the certification denies Co-Lead Plaintiff Avalon Holdings Inc., an institutional investor based in Greece, being a member of the class. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 4:41 pm
  In addition, plaintiffs must specify which particular claims are being alleged by plaintiffs as indirect purchasers rather than direct purchasers.Sun Microsystems, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 5:00 pm
Consequently, the failure to pay the $100.00 earnest money deposit could not serve as a total defense to the plaintiff’s contract action. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 2:04 pm
On March 11, 1964 plaintiff purchased 4,335 poults and, being the prudent poultry farmer he was, that same day obtained a "turkey floater policy" from Fireman's Fund Insurance Company. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 10:45 am by Karsner & Meehan, P.C.
Facts Regarding the Plaintiff’s Injury and Bankruptcy Proceeding It is reported that in April 2018, the plaintiff purchased a battery-operated skateboard that was manufactured by the defendant. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 10:39 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The court found that the parties weren’t direct competitors and TrueCar’s ads weren’t specifically comparative to them, thus preventing any presumption of injury and causation. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 7:34 am by Cassandra Maas
The Cincinnati Insurance Company, the plaintiff also sought insurance coverage related to COVID-19 under an all-risk property insurance policy it purchased from the Cincinnati Insurance Company. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 2:36 pm by Philip R. Stein
Originators certainly did not expect aggregators (purchasers of loans sold by originators) to claim that forbearance triggers an EPD (early payment default) or establishes a contractual breach by the originator of purchase-and-sale agreements, requiring repurchase of the loan by the originator. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 3:07 pm
The court assigned responsibility for litigating federal antitrust claims to the direct purchaser plaintiffs in the multi-district litigation (MDL). [read post]
The District Court issued a sua sponte order to show cause, directing the plaintiff to explain why his action should not be dismissed for subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 8:12 am by Kevin Smith
  She clarifies what she wants by asking to be shown “what a student would have to pay to purchase the entire work. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 3:21 am by Lee E. Berlik
As noted in my earlier blog post, the case ended with a directed verdict in favor of WTVR, because the trial court deemed Ms. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 3:18 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A Staten Island Child Custody Lawyer said the issue in this case is whether the court erred in directing the defendant to pay plaintiff child support in the sum of only $1,112 per month, and, in effect, failed to award plaintiff equitable distribution of certain rental income. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 8:11 am by Ingrid Wuerth
The Court should direct new briefing and have re-argument on that question if it wants to address it. [read post]