Search for: "Doe v. Doe, III." Results 621 - 640 of 10,831
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2011, 2:33 am by gmlevine
Registering a domain name in the belief that the complainant’s trademark is generic does not absolve the respondent competitor, Avaya Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Stern (William & Mary Law School) have posted Analog Analogies: Intel v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 7:08 am
The case of M v M [2010] EWHC 2817 (Fam) (for some reason also reported with the citation [2011] EWHC 3574) involved a successful Hadkinson application on behalf of the wife.The case concerned the wife's application for interim periodical payments, under Part III Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
A Party administering an allocated TRQ shall ensure that: (b) unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, it does not allocate any portion of the quota to a producer group, condition access to an allocation on the purchase of domestic production, or limit access to an allocation to processors; It determined that Canada’s practice of reserving access of 85% or more of the 14 dairy CUSMA processors was indeed inconsistent with Article 3.A.2.11(b). [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 5:12 pm
Now that I've had a chance to read the oral argument transcript from Philip Morris v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 4:04 pm by Jane Chong
This morning Steve summarized the amicus brief he co-authored on behalf of the National Institute of Military Justice in support of the petitioner in al Bahlul v. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 1:38 pm
Archer Yeatts, III, Henrico County General District Court, in Com. v. [read post]