Search for: "Doe v. Scott" Results 621 - 640 of 3,242
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2015, 3:22 pm
Thus, "[t]he law does not require that the information contain the most precise words or phrases most clearly expressing the charge, only that the sex crime and the factual basis therefor be sufficiently alleged" (People v Sylla, 7 Misc 3d 8, 10 [2d Dept 2005]). [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:54 pm by Simon Gibbs
This problem, at least in part, appears to have been recognised by the House of Lords in Fourie v Le Roux [2007] UKHL 1 where Lord Scott of Foscote said:“I think it needs to be understood that the difference between costs at the standard rate and costs on an indemnity basis is, according to the language of the relevant rules, not very great. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
The first seven counts involved allegations of sexual assault against Jane Doe I, a.k.a. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 9:40 am by Steve Hall
Does the Constitution permit the death penalty anyway? [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Supreme Court handed down its decision on the case McCleskey v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 10:02 am by Evan Schaeffer
There are two important lessons for Illinois lawyers in the recent Complete Conference Coordinators, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”[1] Thus, for example, Graber showed, among his many other myth-busting insights, that Marbury v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
  At Simple Justice, Scott Greenfield criticizes Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan for (apparently) failing to vote to grant review; Doug Berman does the same at Sentencing Law and Policy. [read post]