Search for: "Doe v. State" Results 621 - 640 of 104,839
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2014, 9:23 am by Neil Siegel
What I did not mention there is that it now seems harder for the Sixth Circuit to uphold state bans based upon the authority of Baker v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 9:24 am
Selecky, the Ninth Circuit has found that the First Amendment's Free Exercise Clause does not require that pharmacists with a religious objection to the Plan B contraceptive be exempted from the state... [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 6:27 am by Kate Fort
Applying § 15-35-102(11), MCA, to disallow a state tax deduction does not undermine the Tribe’s sovereign authority to tax or govern itself. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 9:23 pm by Patent Docs
Such a situation occurred in IPR2014-00784 (Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 12:07 am
I am currently in the process of drafting an amicus brief in the Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 11:30 am by Eric Goldman
“The government does not manage the internal operations of the social media platform. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 7:35 am
The United States Supreme Court has decided Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 3:17 pm by Paul M. Rashkind
A State court’s determination that a defendant’s mental retardation was a mitigating factor in the penalty phase of a capital case does not trigger Double Jeopardy issue preclusion, and foreclose the question whether, in the wake of the subsequently-decided decision in Atkins v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 1:48 pm by Daily Record Staff
BACKGROUND Washington does not challenge the sufficiency of ... [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 10:13 pm by Daily Record Staff
Convicted by a jury, in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, of two counts of armed robbery and three counts of first-degree assault, as well as use of a handgun in a crime of violence, and possession of a firearm by a disqualified individual, Michael Woods, appellant, contends that the evidence does not support his three assault convictions. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 11:14 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Sexually Violent Persons Rule of completeness In a sexually violent persons trial, the rule of completeness does not require that the jury be informed that, if the respondent were released, hi risk of reoffending would be diminished because he would be supervised for 22 years until he is 74 years old. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 8:37 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Supreme Court has requested that the state of Oregon file a response in Herrera v. [read post]