Search for: "Doe v. Sullivan"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,710
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
As a threshold matter, respondent argues that the appeal must be dismissed because the November 2020 order does not constitute a final judgment (see CPLR 5701 [b] [1]; Matter of Alexander M. v Cleary, 188 AD3d 1471, 1473 [2020]; see also CPLR 5701 [a] [1]). [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
As a threshold matter, respondent argues that the appeal must be dismissed because the November 2020 order does not constitute a final judgment (see CPLR 5701 [b] [1]; Matter of Alexander M. v Cleary, 188 AD3d 1471, 1473 [2020]; see also CPLR 5701 [a] [1]). [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:20 pm
The Carter v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 9:32 am
The Supreme Court. ruling in Maples v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am
Article 10 does not provide a universal justification for inflicting serious, and often unjustified, damage on the reputations of suspects. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:51 am
CJLF has filed this friend-of-the-court brief in Maples v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 4:00 am
Denis v Sauvageau, 2022 ABCA 166 [31] Granting a stay of proceedings pending appeal does not send a message that an appeal has merit. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 2:52 pm
Sullivan (1964). [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 4:03 pm
See Texas v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 2:25 pm
Keith Lee of An Associates Mind comes out strong: Facebook You v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 11:18 pm
In Indiana State University v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE In SEC v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 10:06 am
”); Day v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:25 pm
The Court of Appeals (Sullivan, Cabranes and Nathan) holds that plaintiff cannot show that the white officers had intentionally acted to prevent him from joining the task force and that plaintiff does not assert there was any racially-motivated stereotyping.The case is Hanks v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 6:09 am
This post is based on a Sullivan & Cromwell publication by Robert E. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 7:52 pm
The auction site's response, with which Judge Sullivan agreed, was essentially, "Hey, we're a marketplace. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 8:54 am
Although there are certain exceptions, such as one where the government may require disclosure of such information pursuant to a criminal investigation, California’s First District Court of Appeal in Facebook v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 11:58 am
Earlier: Prior ATL coverage of Charney v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:23 am
Gura took the case from its humble origins in federal district court to a landmark win in District v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 12:56 pm
Sullivan and Rucker, JJ., concur. [read post]
