Search for: "Doe v. United States of America" Results 621 - 640 of 4,634
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2022, 5:01 am by Etta Lanum
By 1981, the Supreme Court was reviewing a sex discrimination case titled Rostker v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 7:39 pm
(Backer, Tweaking Facts, Speaking Judgment: Judicial Transmogrification of Case Narrative as Jurisprudence in the United States and Britain, Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 6:611, 616 (1998).)This insight may help untangle some of the discursive trajectories in the case and the declaraitons. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 1:57 am by Florian Mueller
In one of the most important antitrust cases in the history of our industry, the Google Android case (one of several pending Google v. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 9:03 am by Alvaro Marañon
  Executive Order on Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets MARCH 9, 2022 By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows: Section 1. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:18 am by Eric Goldman
’” The examining attorney at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) refused to register the proposed mark on the ground the phrase falsely suggests a connection with a person (here Donald Trump) in violation of Lanham Act Section 2(a), and also because this mark violates Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 2:33 pm
  Please rise if you are able and show that, Yes, we the United States of America stand with the Ukrainian people. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 1:01 pm
"Nor does it take full consideration of the history and complexity of the current crisis. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 10:00 pm by binder'sblog
” Secretary of State John Kerry did great damage to America. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Following the United States Supreme Court’s twisted rulings in Baze v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 10:45 pm by Florian Mueller
One day after the United States International Trade Commission ("USITC" or just "ITC") instituted three investigations further to Ericsson v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 11:25 am by Dennis Crouch
  U.S. patents only cover infringement within the  territorial bounds of the United States. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
’’ Despite the choice of law provision, George Frank unilaterally added the following language at the end of paragraph 19: ‘‘Since this is a contract for an agreement taking place in the state of Connecticut, Connecticut laws will supersede those of California. [read post]