Search for: "Doe v. Williams" Results 621 - 640 of 7,878
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2023, 6:08 am by Emma Svoboda
On Jan. 17, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S, v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The historiography of the war has changed substantially, but the war as historical gloss does not change. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I offer a couple of examples, written by Chief Justice Hughes (who was no slouch as a lawyer), out of many that could be deployed.[12]  Wood v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 10:20 am by Ronald Mann
ShareWednesday’s argument in Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:55 am by jonathanturley
” The reason cited is his opinion he wrote in the 1987 case of McCleskey v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am by INFORRM
IPSO 11191-21 Sharif v The Jewish Chronicle, 12 Discrimination (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), No breach – after investigation 11103-22 A woman v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 10895-22 Various v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 10780-22 Raeburn v southwalesguardian, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication… [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
But the exteriorized signification of human rights is contested in its interiorization: what, for instance does it mean for such rights to be self-evident, and on whom on they vested? [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
After all, the first secessionists met in Hartford in 1814, and William Lloyd Garrison famously endorsed “no Union with slaveholders. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:56 am by Jeff Welty
” When does open carry cross the line? [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 5:01 am by Karen Greenberg
At Guantanamo, being cleared for release does not mean actual release, a reality that many have come to accept but that, even nearly 21 years later, highlights the lack of legal clarity and normalcy there. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 10:11 am by Eugene Volokh
See, e.g., People v Anderson (Cal. 2002) ("duress is not a defense to any form of murder"); Am Jur 2d, Homicide (it is "generally held" that duress is not a defense to murder and that "duress [does not] mitigate murder to manslaughter"). [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
How long does each  Lords Hansard reporter spend in the chamber before returning to their office to transcribe? [read post]